From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: liming.wu@jaguarmicro.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: fix compilation issue
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 13:20:52 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGHPRHj1gb3tPR9C@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230515012930.946-1-liming.wu@jaguarmicro.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2163 bytes --]
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:29:30AM +0800, liming.wu@jaguarmicro.com wrote:
> From: Liming Wu <liming.wu@jaguarmicro.com>
>
> This patch is used to fix following compilation issue with legacy gcc
> and define variables at the beginning of the function
What GCC version?
>
> error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
> 2098 | for (int p = 0; p < CMN_MAX_PORTS; p++)
>
> Signed-off-by: Liming Wu <liming.wu@jaguarmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index 47d359f72957..2299fcde5b4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -2009,8 +2009,11 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
> u16 child_count, child_poff;
> u32 xp_offset[CMN_MAX_XPS];
> u64 reg;
> - int i, j;
> + int i, j, p;
> size_t sz;
> + void __iomem *xp_region;
> + struct arm_cmn_node *xp;
> + unsigned int xp_ports;
>
> arm_cmn_init_node_info(cmn, rgn_offset, &cfg);
> if (cfg.type != CMN_TYPE_CFG)
> @@ -2067,9 +2070,9 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
> cmn->dns = dn;
> cmn->dtms = dtm;
> for (i = 0; i < cmn->num_xps; i++) {
> - void __iomem *xp_region = cmn->base + xp_offset[i];
> - struct arm_cmn_node *xp = dn++;
> - unsigned int xp_ports = 0;
> + xp_region = cmn->base + xp_offset[i];
> + xp = dn++;
> + xp_ports = 0;
>
> arm_cmn_init_node_info(cmn, xp_offset[i], xp);
> /*
> @@ -2095,7 +2098,7 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
> * from this, since in that case we will see at least one XP
> * with port 2 connected, for the HN-D.
> */
> - for (int p = 0; p < CMN_MAX_PORTS; p++)
> + for (p = 0; p < CMN_MAX_PORTS; p++)
> if (arm_cmn_device_connect_info(cmn, xp, p))
> xp_ports |= BIT(p);
>
Is above manually tracking xp* variables?
I'm confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 1:29 [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: fix compilation issue liming.wu
2023-05-15 6:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2023-05-15 8:31 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-15 8:35 ` Liming Wu
2023-05-15 12:29 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGHPRHj1gb3tPR9C@debian.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=liming.wu@jaguarmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox