From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
horms@kernel.org, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
John.p.donnelly@oracle.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: kdump: simplify the reservation behaviour of crashkernel=,high
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 11:00:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGLxul+c4vYQBn27@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230414143413.GA27911@willie-the-truck>
Hi Will,
On 04/14/23 at 03:34pm, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 10:24:19AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On arm64, reservation for 'crashkernel=xM,high' is taken by searching for
> > suitable memory region top down. If the 'xM' of crashkernel high memory
> > is reserved from high memory successfully, it will try to reserve
> > crashkernel low memory later accoringly. Otherwise, it will try to search
> > low memory area for the 'xM' suitable region. Please see the details in
> > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt.
>
> [...]
>
> > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> I tried to apply this, but smatch is unhappy with the result:
>
> | arch/arm64/mm/init.c:153 reserve_crashkernel() error: uninitialized symbol 'search_base'.
>
> I _think_ this is a false positive, but I must say that the control flow
> in reserve_crashkernel() is extremely hard to follow so I couldn't be
> sure. If the static checker is struggling, then so will humans!
>
> Ideally, this would all be restructured to make it easier to follow,
> but in the short term we need something to squash the warning.
I tried to refactor the code as you suggested, while it seems not easy
to do. The complexity comes from several cases which need be handled.
I try my best to write a document with the things I think important to
help understand the code. Please help check if it helps or we just having
the current code is fine.
Thanks
Baoquan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-16 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-07 2:24 [PATCH v5] arm64: kdump: simplify the reservation behaviour of crashkernel=,high Baoquan He
2023-04-07 2:32 ` Baoquan He
2023-04-12 11:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-13 7:45 ` Baoquan He
2023-04-13 14:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-14 2:27 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2023-04-14 9:49 ` Baoquan He
2023-04-14 14:34 ` Will Deacon
2023-04-15 0:43 ` Baoquan He
2023-05-16 3:00 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGLxul+c4vYQBn27@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=John.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox