public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Kelvin.Cao@microchip.com
Cc: hch@infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	George.Ge@microchip.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	logang@deltatee.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: Introduce Switchtec DMA engine PCI driver
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 22:00:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGMOCBAVvAxMa/lb@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ee5aa616475cc39b04c6b9e84db119bc8fc4d53.camel@microchip.com>

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 06:18:07PM +0000, Kelvin.Cao@microchip.com wrote:
> > I find this rather confusing, especially as some code literally
> > switches on the op to fill in either set.
> 
> It's a hardware interface, and not possible to change it at the point.
> I guess I can make it look slightly better by grouping the related
> names together:
> 
> union {
>         struct {
>                 __le32 saddr_lo;
>                 __le32 saddr_hi;
>         };
>         struct {
>                 __le32 widata_lo;
>                 __le32 widata_hi;
>         };
> };

The hardware interface is simply:

	__le32 field_lo;
	__le32 field_hi;

hardware documentation might decide to give those fields two different
names just to confuse you :)

I think everyone else would be served better by:
	
	__le32 addr_lo; /* SADDR_LO/WIADDR_LO */
	__le32 addr_hi; /* SADDR_HI/WIADDR_HI */


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-16  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-23 21:37 [PATCH v4 0/1] Switchtec Switch DMA Engine Driver Kelvin Cao
2023-04-23 21:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: Introduce Switchtec DMA engine PCI driver Kelvin Cao
2023-04-24  1:36   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-03  6:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-05  0:31     ` Kelvin.Cao
2023-05-15 15:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-15 18:18         ` Kelvin.Cao
2023-05-16  5:00           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-05-16  5:20             ` Kelvin.Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZGMOCBAVvAxMa/lb@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=George.Ge@microchip.com \
    --cc=Kelvin.Cao@microchip.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox