From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, bp@alien8.de,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECT] perf/core: Remove pmu linear searching code
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 11:27:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZH24fi8MWALIV72Z@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230605101401.GL38236@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:14:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:27:31AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > That said; given that this commit has been tagged twice now, I suppose I
> > should go revert it and we'll try again after a more thorough audit.
>
> I'll go queue this then...
>
> ---
> Subject: perf: Re-instate the linear PMU search
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 5 11:42:39 CEST 2023
>
> Full revert of commit 9551fbb64d09 ("perf/core: Remove pmu linear
> searching code").
>
> Some architectures (notably arm/arm64) still relied on the linear
> search in order to find the PMU that consumes
> PERF_TYPE_{HARDWARE,HW_CACHE,RAW}.
>
> This will need a more thorought audit and clean.
>
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks for sorting this out!
Mark.
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -11630,27 +11630,38 @@ static struct pmu *perf_init_event(struc
> }
>
> again:
> - ret = -ENOENT;
> rcu_read_lock();
> pmu = idr_find(&pmu_idr, type);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> - if (!pmu)
> - goto fail;
> + if (pmu) {
> + if (event->attr.type != type && type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> + !(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + ret = perf_try_init_event(pmu, event);
> + if (ret == -ENOENT && event->attr.type != type && !extended_type) {
> + type = event->attr.type;
> + goto again;
> + }
>
> - if (event->attr.type != type && type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> - !(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE))
> - goto fail;
> -
> - ret = perf_try_init_event(pmu, event);
> - if (ret == -ENOENT && event->attr.type != type && !extended_type) {
> - type = event->attr.type;
> - goto again;
> + if (ret)
> + pmu = ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry, lockdep_is_held(&pmus_srcu)) {
> + ret = perf_try_init_event(pmu, event);
> + if (!ret)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + if (ret != -ENOENT) {
> + pmu = ERR_PTR(ret);
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + }
> fail:
> - if (ret)
> - pmu = ERR_PTR(ret);
> -
> + pmu = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> unlock:
> srcu_read_unlock(&pmus_srcu, idx);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-04 11:38 [REGRESSION][BISECT] perf/core: Remove pmu linear searching code Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 2:59 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-05 6:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 3:26 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-05 7:10 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-05 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-05 9:43 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-05 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-05 10:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-05 10:27 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-06-06 8:18 ` [tip: perf/core] perf: Re-instate the linear PMU search tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-05 9:34 ` [REGRESSION][BISECT] perf/core: Remove pmu linear searching code Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-05 9:54 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 10:03 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-20 12:38 ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZH24fi8MWALIV72Z@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox