public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: separate bpf_counter_list and bpf_filters
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 16:03:09 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHECbcoVx6kK2tWQ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230519235757.3613719-1-song@kernel.org>

Em Fri, May 19, 2023 at 04:57:57PM -0700, Song Liu escreveu:
> evsel uses a union for the two lists. This turned out to be error prone.
> For example:
> 
> [root@quaco ~]# perf stat --bpf-prog 5246
> Error: cpu-clock event does not have sample flags 66c660
> failed to set filter "(null)" on event cpu-clock with 2 (No such file or
> directory)
> 
> Fix this issue by separating the two lists.


Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> Fixes: 56ec9457a4a2 ("perf bpf filter: Implement event sample filtering")
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 1 +
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 6 ++----
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 2f5910b31fa9..c2dbb5647e75 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ void evsel__init(struct evsel *evsel,
>  	evsel->bpf_fd	   = -1;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->config_terms);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->bpf_counter_list);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->bpf_filters);
>  	perf_evsel__object.init(evsel);
>  	evsel->sample_size = __evsel__sample_size(attr->sample_type);
>  	evsel__calc_id_pos(evsel);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index df8928745fc6..0f54f28a69c2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -151,10 +151,8 @@ struct evsel {
>  	 */
>  	struct bpf_counter_ops	*bpf_counter_ops;
>  
> -	union {
> -		struct list_head	bpf_counter_list; /* for perf-stat -b */
> -		struct list_head	bpf_filters; /* for perf-record --filter */
> -	};
> +	struct list_head	bpf_counter_list; /* for perf-stat -b */
> +	struct list_head	bpf_filters; /* for perf-record --filter */
>  
>  	/* for perf-stat --use-bpf */
>  	int			bperf_leader_prog_fd;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2023-05-26 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-19 23:57 [PATCH] perf: separate bpf_counter_list and bpf_filters Song Liu
2023-05-26 19:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZHECbcoVx6kK2tWQ@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox