From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: separate bpf_counter_list and bpf_filters
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 16:03:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHECbcoVx6kK2tWQ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230519235757.3613719-1-song@kernel.org>
Em Fri, May 19, 2023 at 04:57:57PM -0700, Song Liu escreveu:
> evsel uses a union for the two lists. This turned out to be error prone.
> For example:
>
> [root@quaco ~]# perf stat --bpf-prog 5246
> Error: cpu-clock event does not have sample flags 66c660
> failed to set filter "(null)" on event cpu-clock with 2 (No such file or
> directory)
>
> Fix this issue by separating the two lists.
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> Fixes: 56ec9457a4a2 ("perf bpf filter: Implement event sample filtering")
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 6 ++----
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 2f5910b31fa9..c2dbb5647e75 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ void evsel__init(struct evsel *evsel,
> evsel->bpf_fd = -1;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->config_terms);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->bpf_counter_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->bpf_filters);
> perf_evsel__object.init(evsel);
> evsel->sample_size = __evsel__sample_size(attr->sample_type);
> evsel__calc_id_pos(evsel);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index df8928745fc6..0f54f28a69c2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -151,10 +151,8 @@ struct evsel {
> */
> struct bpf_counter_ops *bpf_counter_ops;
>
> - union {
> - struct list_head bpf_counter_list; /* for perf-stat -b */
> - struct list_head bpf_filters; /* for perf-record --filter */
> - };
> + struct list_head bpf_counter_list; /* for perf-stat -b */
> + struct list_head bpf_filters; /* for perf-record --filter */
>
> /* for perf-stat --use-bpf */
> int bperf_leader_prog_fd;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-26 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 23:57 [PATCH] perf: separate bpf_counter_list and bpf_filters Song Liu
2023-05-26 19:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHECbcoVx6kK2tWQ@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox