From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2546C7EE23 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 21:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232442AbjFGVXH (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2023 17:23:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47084 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231935AbjFGVXF (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2023 17:23:05 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563621BD5; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 14:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 357LMsij013403; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 23:22:54 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 23:22:54 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Zhangjin Wu , thomas@t-8ch.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: nolibc patches, still possible for 6.5 ? Message-ID: References: <5494ac68-b4b9-434f-92c1-7e197c92a4ab@paulmck-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:03:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > (There were some kernel test > > > robot complaints as well, valid or not I am not sure.) > > > > You mean in relation with nolibc stuff (or nolibc-test) or something > > totally different ? > > Apologies, this was me being confused and failing to look closely. > > The complaints were not about nolibc, but rather about my patches that > they were on top of. Not your problem! Ah no problem :-) > And please let me know when the next batch from your tree are ready to go. > (You might have been saying that they were in your recent emails, but > I thought I should double-check.) No pb, I just sent it while you were writing and our emails have crossed :-) In short, it's ready now with branch 20230606-nolibc-rv32+stkp7a but if you need any more info (more detailed summary, a public repost of the whole series etc), just let me know. And I faced 2 kernel build errors on s390x and riscv about rcu_task something, though you might be interested :-/ Thanks, Willy