public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix incorrect rq start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns after throttled
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:56:35 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIJco7_jaVaxpxSR@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c82d6bab-36d0-0403-9304-4415f6ffd972@linux.dev>

Hello,

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:22:28PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
...
> But for plug batched allocation introduced by the commit 47c122e35d7e
> ("block: pre-allocate requests if plug is started and is a batch"), we can
> rq_qos_throttle() after the allocation of the request. This is what the
> blk_mq_get_cached_request() does.
> 
> In this case, the cached request alloc_time_ns or start_time_ns is much ahead
> if block in any qos ->throttle().

Ah, okay, that's problematic.

> >> This patch add nr_flush counter in blk_plug, so we can tell if the task
> >> has throttled in any qos ->throttle(), in which case we need to correct
> >> the rq start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns.
> >>
> >> Another solution may be make rq_qos_throttle() return bool to indicate
> >> if it has throttled in any qos ->throttle(). But this need more changes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> > 
> > Depending on the flush behavior and adjusting alloc_time_ns seems fragile to
> > me and will likely confuse other users of alloc_time_ns too.
> 
> I agree with you, this code is not good. My basic idea is to adjust the cached
> request alloc_time_ns and start_time_ns when throttled.

Would it make sense to skip setting the alloc_time_ns during pre-allocation
and set it later when the pre-allocated rq is actually used? That should
jive better.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01  5:39 [PATCH] blk-mq: fix incorrect rq start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns after throttled chengming.zhou
2023-06-05 18:31 ` Tejun Heo
2023-06-06 10:22   ` Chengming Zhou
2023-06-08 22:56     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-06-24 15:24       ` Chengming Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZIJco7_jaVaxpxSR@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox