From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0613C7EE2F for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239567AbjFIIMS (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2023 04:12:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48576 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230391AbjFIIMQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2023 04:12:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE1AB9; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 01:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f732d37d7cso14250885e9.2; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 01:12:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686298333; x=1688890333; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/K5tYpr0uyjRNSZAPyx3ZIoIIDJLXA5XyIkkuNX3V10=; b=U5smjNqwRLICYAf9BnfzzvQesG0TofUWx5lEm4axQW7kDdK+jGuIDIwUD+KBzbIwQo /FBIc1lk+eYZgHqtGv9FVW7FqxQg1EHGMDGpLJVUm6vsqOmfUP1cMZZAZxKaSOMjBEa8 0xLDw3m2+L/PSX07fVXMkdznWZ0O7o+Fl7OC3n8BHa676nF3ASIGHpP7uQs8B83pGv9i iMAwimHfjgDoqO5x6Oi7SA++BpikpCguxB7yk4weYLWzuMirZTwcmWsFRQwGsxggesV+ 03lxkRASFO48RNQ7FsMhn81nd5lGqQ0lS8YXHIWOn/Xm/Z6v03aFC0HoLLv6it8eUCYt lu9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686298333; x=1688890333; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=/K5tYpr0uyjRNSZAPyx3ZIoIIDJLXA5XyIkkuNX3V10=; b=XTjEiW3RoJMBsLVp+WA/RgUSC6CTjKGUll48ccxa234pYvhmWV16+3yLQwz/PtFz2N Zraoi7ZSBnE+n5Xir/fy4dXmBqWjoFlBoHzso2pR0T/nRLjs0B8605hBlqBQL5t+j4q1 tYvUqekd9Kx05sLNQwELA9hP4VNnXqI9TKamMMsFcLY0MFX8gwjCseZ23K3TaXyKjTui Ev4w6Dq18g0MtZZB7rzkfEdco52yo+ZckJxlgm+MEHfwQjYvpQ/stjR7uPvgoQUxHn8R YmtGS0YI/NV6IGd4licV7tQHsobEYFkZ5Rjin5j18b35jYWYgOAsbcRdTVWICYkFOOnq VgYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwx0HeTHo4RL8wSKOQNnVa1IYrFjfeTn+/0Z4nZ6kFvovfJEzBs ouxdn4f18b3LIjhRqeeJNK8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5pMVfMD2N6fxcWKg1ENmmI5IvXZhleR9/leoP5eQbaNK2wmzw/zgbW+vJt+ArN/b3USKzlCw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb0e:0:b0:3f4:2ae5:b35d with SMTP id u14-20020a7bcb0e000000b003f42ae5b35dmr518114wmj.40.1686298332758; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 01:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p18-20020a05600c205200b003f74eb308fasm1806222wmg.48.2023.06.09.01.12.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Jun 2023 01:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 09:12:10 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/88] 4.19.285-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230607200854.030202132@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230607200854.030202132@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:15:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.285 release. > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230511): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3799 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip