* RE: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-06-12 21:52 ` Chris Paterson
2023-06-12 22:17 ` Shuah Khan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Paterson @ 2023-06-12 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Hello Greg,
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 11:26 AM
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Thank you for the release!
CIP configurations built and booted okay with Linux 5.10.184-rc1 (32cae866b182):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/897026175
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/commits/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Chris Paterson (CIP) <chris.paterson2@renesas.com>
Kind regards, Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-12 21:52 ` Chris Paterson
@ 2023-06-12 22:17 ` Shuah Khan
2023-06-13 8:38 ` Jon Hunter
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-06-12 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 6/12/23 04:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.184-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-12 21:52 ` Chris Paterson
2023-06-12 22:17 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-06-13 8:38 ` Jon Hunter
2023-06-13 9:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-06-13 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 12:25:52 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.184-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.184-rc1-g32cae866b182
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-13 8:38 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2023-06-13 9:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-06-13 12:13 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-06-13 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 16:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.184-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.184-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 32cae866b1825021bd263dbd8dbb522e1d0df8a6
* git describe: v5.10.183-69-g32cae866b182
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.183-69-g32cae866b182
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.183)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.183)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.183)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.183)
## Test result summary
total: 127773, pass: 107744, fail: 3845, skip: 16007, xfail: 177
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 117 total, 116 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 45 total, 43 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 35 total, 32 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-13 9:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-06-13 12:13 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2023-06-13 16:35 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2023-06-13 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230511):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3913
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3914
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-13 12:13 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2023-06-13 16:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-13 17:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-13 17:45 ` Allen Pais
2023-06-13 23:09 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-06-13 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 6/12/23 03:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Am I the only one seeing this problem ?
Build reference: v5.10.183-69-g32cae866b182
Compiler version: x86_64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.39
Building x86_64:allyesconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
x86_64-linux-objcopy: vmlinux: unsupported relocation type 0x44
x86_64-linux-objcopy: vmlinux[.text]: relocation count is negative: bad value
make[3]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:114: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Unsupported relocation type: unknown type rel type name (-1939958716)
make[3]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:122: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs] Error 1
make[3]: *** Deleting file 'arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs'
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/Makefile:115: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/Makefile:274: bzImage] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
It affects 5.4.y and 5.10.y for me.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-13 16:35 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-06-13 17:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-13 18:01 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-06-13 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 09:35:37AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/12/23 03:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> > There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Am I the only one seeing this problem ?
>
> Build reference: v5.10.183-69-g32cae866b182
> Compiler version: x86_64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
> Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.39
>
> Building x86_64:allyesconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> x86_64-linux-objcopy: vmlinux: unsupported relocation type 0x44
> x86_64-linux-objcopy: vmlinux[.text]: relocation count is negative: bad value
> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:114: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> Unsupported relocation type: unknown type rel type name (-1939958716)
> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:122: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Deleting file 'arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs'
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/Makefile:115: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/Makefile:274: bzImage] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
>
> It affects 5.4.y and 5.10.y for me.
Odd. Let me go build with gcc-11, I have just moved to gcc-12 on those
two branches locally...
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-13 17:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-06-13 18:01 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-06-13 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 6/13/23 10:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 09:35:37AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 6/12/23 03:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
>>> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Am I the only one seeing this problem ?
>>
>> Build reference: v5.10.183-69-g32cae866b182
>> Compiler version: x86_64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
>> Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.39
>>
>> Building x86_64:allyesconfig ... failed
>> --------------
>> Error log:
>> x86_64-linux-objcopy: vmlinux: unsupported relocation type 0x44
>> x86_64-linux-objcopy: vmlinux[.text]: relocation count is negative: bad value
>> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:114: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin] Error 1
>> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> Unsupported relocation type: unknown type rel type name (-1939958716)
>> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:122: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs] Error 1
>> make[3]: *** Deleting file 'arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs'
>> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/Makefile:115: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/Makefile:274: bzImage] Error 2
>> make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
>>
>> It affects 5.4.y and 5.10.y for me.
>
> Odd. Let me go build with gcc-11, I have just moved to gcc-12 on those
> two branches locally...
>
Don't bother. This seems to be related to my build environment, not to the kernel.
Rebuilding passed on different servers. It may have to do with my recent update
to Ubuntu 22.04 on the server experiencing the problem. I'll try to figure out
what is going on. Sorry for the noise.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-13 16:35 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-06-13 17:45 ` Allen Pais
2023-06-13 23:09 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-06-13 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.184-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
2023-06-12 10:25 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-13 17:45 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-06-13 23:09 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-06-13 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:16:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 485 pass: 485 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread