From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2FCEB64DC for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343766AbjFOLR7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:17:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343773AbjFOLRy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:17:54 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B95268C; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 04:17:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1686827873; x=1718363873; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hnlWnFgVThUFXWgEDt/gfZMVF79mIwmPpAPRvoKzkRw=; b=YqTPMA7YTBDyQumA7KBUq8vNyLOOiWXTQ8zy0hMuGj+Po5LmcsoTJPEm JVGnkHt9xtYrAXwc6qJ/8KAblXYQht8nlrQWoF0tNOD2yMmDwA8TCMoN4 uGJeMPalBDqhiRzRlp98PUZzcSuu2+gsZhHESSpMth+ZL52ev4K7KSiTp Nyng91uvczaZLtkyTNtwdgOwNAtpGZHNlHsKkaax2gQxEGxCpWWeWbnyr 3GvKppSIeLnsY3iDwGxqBtOH+pRVeaqciJDkcZ+0WBolcE8quE9q9L+lg 61iQtUzXoUWgD4/if3M2j/Lk2jyMYqF1W4mbEW6s86e0Gn1sI2Xor6OcJ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10741"; a="348552650" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,244,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="348552650" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2023 04:17:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10741"; a="712420453" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,244,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="712420453" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2023 04:17:32 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1q9kyo-003vVz-37; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:17:30 +0300 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:17:30 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Jadav, Raag" Cc: "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" , "N, Pandith" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: intel: refine ->irq_set_type() hook Message-ID: References: <20230613085054.10976-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20230613085054.10976-3-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20230615095517.GV45886@black.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:08:38AM +0000, Jadav, Raag wrote: ... > Should I add all of this in original patch or send this as a separate patch > on top this series? Always base the changes on the respective subsystem tree, don't forget to use --base when formatting patch with Git tools. Then send it separately. The 3rd patch in the series is questionable to me. I would like to look into it later on separately. (The first implies that there is no changes as per this series in that function). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko