Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs

Kent Overstreet
2023-07-06T20:15:20Z

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 03:17:43PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/28/23 2:44?PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 6/28/23 11:52?AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:57:02AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> I discussed this with Christian offline. I have a patch that is pretty
> >>> simple, but it does mean that you'd wait for delayed fput flush off
> >>> umount. Which seems kind of iffy.
> >>>
> >>> I think we need to back up a bit and consider if the kill && umount
> >>> really is sane. If you kill a task that has open files, then any fput
> >>> from that task will end up being delayed. This means that the umount may
> >>> very well fail.
> >>>
> >>> It'd be handy if we could have umount wait for that to finish, but I'm
> >>> not at all confident this is a sane solution for all cases. And as
> >>> discussed, we have no way to even identify which files we'd need to
> >>> flush out of the delayed list.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe the test case just needs fixing? Christian suggested lazy/detach
> >>> umount and wait for sb release. There's an fsnotify hook for that,
> >>> fsnotify_sb_delete(). Obviously this is a bit more involved, but seems
> >>> to me that this would be the way to make it more reliable when killing
> >>> of tasks with open files are involved.
> >>
> >> No, this is a real breakage. Any time we introduce unexpected
> >> asynchrony there's the potential for breakage: case in point, there was
> >> a filesystem that made rm asynchronous, then there were scripts out
> >> there that deleted until df showed under some threshold.. whoops...
> >
> > This is nothing new - any fput done from an exiting task will end up
> > being deferred. The window may be a bit wider now or a bit different,
> > but it's the same window. If an application assumes it can kill && wait
> > on a task and be guaranteed that the files are released as soon as wait
> > returns, it is mistaken. That is NOT the case.
>
> Case in point, just changed my reproducer to use aio instead of
> io_uring. Here's the full script:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> DEV=/dev/nvme1n1
> MNT=/data
> ITER=0
>
> while true; do
> echo loop $ITER
> sudo mount $DEV $MNT
> fio --name=test --ioengine=aio --iodepth=2 --filename=$MNT/foo --size=1g --buffered=1 --overwrite=0 --numjobs=12 --minimal --rw=randread --output=/dev/null &
> Y=$(($RANDOM % 3))
> X=$(($RANDOM % 10))
> VAL="$Y.$X"
> sleep $VAL
> ps -e | grep fio > /dev/null 2>&1
> while [ $? -eq 0 ]; do
> killall -9 fio > /dev/null 2>&1
> echo will wait
> wait > /dev/null 2>&1
> echo done waiting
> ps -e | grep "fio " > /dev/null 2>&1
> done
> sudo umount /data
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> break
> fi
> ((ITER++))
> done
>
> and if I run that, fails on the first umount attempt in that loop:
>
> axboe@m1max-kvm ~> bash test2.sh
> loop 0
> will wait
> done waiting
> umount: /data: target is busy.

Your test fails because fio by default spawns off multiple processes,
and just calling wait does not wait for the subprocesses.

When I pass --thread to fio, your test passes.

I have a patch to avoid use of the delayed_fput list in the aio path,
but curiously it seems not to be needed - perhaps there's some other
synchronization I haven't found yet. I'm including the patch below in
case the technique is useful for io_uring:

diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index b3e14a9fe3..00cb953efa 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct aio_kiocb {
* for cancellation */
refcount_t ki_refcnt;

+ struct task_struct *ki_task;
/*
* If the aio_resfd field of the userspace iocb is not zero,
* this is the underlying eventfd context to deliver events to.
@@ -321,7 +322,7 @@ static void put_aio_ring_file(struct kioctx *ctx)
ctx->aio_ring_file = NULL;
spin_unlock(&i_mapping->private_lock);

- fput(aio_ring_file);
+ __fput_sync(aio_ring_file);
}
}

@@ -1068,6 +1069,7 @@ static inline struct aio_kiocb *aio_get_req(struct kioctx *ctx)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->ki_list);
refcount_set(&req->ki_refcnt, 2);
req->ki_eventfd = NULL;
+ req->ki_task = get_task_struct(current);
return req;
}

@@ -1104,8 +1106,9 @@ static inline void iocb_destroy(struct aio_kiocb *iocb)
if (iocb->ki_eventfd)
eventfd_ctx_put(iocb->ki_eventfd);
if (iocb->ki_filp)
- fput(iocb->ki_filp);
+ fput_for_task(iocb->ki_filp, iocb->ki_task);
percpu_ref_put(&iocb->ki_ctx->reqs);
+ put_task_struct(iocb->ki_task);
kmem_cache_free(kiocb_cachep, iocb);
}

diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
index 372653b926..137f87f55e 100644
--- a/fs/file_table.c
+++ b/fs/file_table.c
@@ -367,12 +367,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_delayed_fput);

static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(delayed_fput_work, delayed_fput);

-void fput(struct file *file)
+void fput_for_task(struct file *file, struct task_struct *task)
{
if (atomic_long_dec_and_test(&file->f_count)) {
- struct task_struct *task = current;
+ if (!task && likely(!in_interrupt() && !(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))
+ task = current;

- if (likely(!in_interrupt() && !(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))) {
+ if (task) {
init_task_work(&file->f_rcuhead, ____fput);
if (!task_work_add(task, &file->f_rcuhead, TWA_RESUME))
return;
@@ -388,6 +389,11 @@ void fput(struct file *file)
}
}

+void fput(struct file *file)
+{
+ fput_for_task(file, NULL);
+}
+
/*
* synchronous analog of fput(); for kernel threads that might be needed
* in some umount() (and thus can't use flush_delayed_fput() without
@@ -405,6 +411,7 @@ void __fput_sync(struct file *file)
}
}

+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fput_for_task);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fput);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__fput_sync);

diff --git a/include/linux/file.h b/include/linux/file.h
index 39704eae83..667a68f477 100644
--- a/include/linux/file.h
+++ b/include/linux/file.h
@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>

struct file;
+struct task_struct;

+extern void fput_for_task(struct file *, struct task_struct *);
extern void fput(struct file *);

struct file_operations;