From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043DCEB64DC for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231705AbjF0Lsf (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 07:48:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53660 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231665AbjF0Ls0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 07:48:26 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1F71BE9 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 04:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4f95bf5c493so5827782e87.3 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 04:48:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1687866502; x=1690458502; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TqtZzMODsbge3FzH7PvLUrnH/SiLk9B9uttmIxMRB9A=; b=h8yr8dvOrJ0iH5h7MIU7WDJH3arIKIdGOmrnsLpZMg2N6kIkWB5bXWRQEFVlIVHYhl vERaRnYF3SezsIw2nNT2qHPe/3gryu+PKF2+tgATGrNvZtdhpEahyfNGB2FwvY4bpzKQ 2A7PCXdoYZLeABDjxg/I0N2LBJW8BfBF9dYbBm8DLlWkgo4pXILEoeHrYAaD1Ra7kDZt pCW22/XG4Q+53wxduia/TNszRjihMEzJzeXKXrKvrlLfNJ/y7jvgnPKHH86z/6pSdf/R tkpSFw3eYJWYJZPxFCMbJN5U/P33dz3bpHAs5ewVvFWyCUv8lE6ndtwLCDaj/k6Wh8+B Cvig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687866502; x=1690458502; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TqtZzMODsbge3FzH7PvLUrnH/SiLk9B9uttmIxMRB9A=; b=SY7GQwxGfkmyO8i+eL9TLZJeW/mSgVaZdO6q78W1Ts+Xhnn75w/4wje3w+BVpV8pQI y4i/HvMAHA4tCPqi5mWy2FyRjaK5R7w+IuDDXwEYT+UytiddlRZ8Aa+W1TpTUnbc4EUv gc1w2grZdScZDwZgAOS06n3Cy4RPzBme5L7XaB1lB1QL3KHnmYft7nivI42n4gnQ0y0R xvAmJMzS6283i+5fjOQbOrTqMieVbNl2cp5jDt9j15mnnXP2fH6uglhCGBP3MJkzPnvj cHik2ALDft8o3EJkEncKz3ZdiQDETRRtFhpWHTGW+wbn8g4Q6WzlNKc79EZkNE/AIquO mkVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxsvhHkbZ/6bAN60BkzjQ8oDCvtfqlBt9v0bIePBN6Ao9q6L3aO kFHRsl3Ep0w0Nm8Pgij4b+IOfA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5jX/9fIQBU4Yh+tw4SLl9c7pvuSEWOqS1dGPgDoJHSSLoURkOcwnvfv30ESG0kb0+EZH+a2w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:455:b0:4fb:8939:d962 with SMTP id y21-20020a056512045500b004fb8939d962mr543348lfk.19.1687866501847; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 04:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linaro.org ([62.231.110.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14-20020a05600c020e00b003f8d6647661sm13413655wmi.15.2023.06.27.04.48.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 04:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:48:19 +0300 From: Abel Vesa To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , avel Machek , Len Brown , Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , Konrad Dybcio , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Taniya Das , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PM: domains: Allow devices attached to genpd to be managed by HW Message-ID: References: <20230627104033.3345659-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org> <2023062741-passion-scarcity-2390@gregkh> <2023062711-unwitting-unwomanly-aa55@gregkh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2023062711-unwitting-unwomanly-aa55@gregkh> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23-06-27 13:02:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:54:06PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote: > > On 23-06-27 12:46:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Also, why is this a RFC series? What is left to do with it to get it > > > into a state which you feel comfortable having us review it "for real"? > > > > There is a bit of back story here. This HW control support is something > > that Qualcomm platforms support for some of the PDs. Sent this as RFC > > as I thought it might open up a discussion of such a generic need at > > first. But now that I think of it, it might've been a non-RFC patch as > > well. > > You need to provide that information, otherwise what are we supposed to > do with this patch series? What would you do if you got it in your > inbox? Will do in the next version. Thanks. > > thanks, > > greg k-h