From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E07C0015E for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231540AbjGKWcG (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2023 18:32:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229937AbjGKWcE (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2023 18:32:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4A921A3 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b88f151d8eso72855ad.0 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:32:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1689114723; x=1691706723; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=leT/dmHN5ogjVjMKIS2IvCyaGv4tZ/MjdUNv3TIsuVc=; b=VxuPsBfSuE2OMcc29zoAaGLA5c9bUziPP6fynRsOyX0sjBNU+jQ49oL8VDUV5rnmNf KSqXMxl0aO/I3FPNSR6lYMxG8M6Fo2OMnzOznPIhoC+ZJcIkNqYRPp8aFl9uD+HZvteE iGARbOR1v/DSeOnE+STnfqUwGbXg9H0Nq0cKSnYWgHu2s+Sjy5rD2E8bmK0y6VQ81lk7 ZFzCKzrFP59/mXZPH8lTKc3/LfSXAVOoXnU1sV/wlrvRAgorxyuAGUWppxT1m5PiSrCt J1lHBYi1YIS8EKsXts2vop5NpIePmUxF6RovCkBqz0Z02S8IbczR2aUAK8dyFTZblNju 6dtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689114723; x=1691706723; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=leT/dmHN5ogjVjMKIS2IvCyaGv4tZ/MjdUNv3TIsuVc=; b=S9tmG2+mFAmIhAzCa6uNBael/megmCLYIX37DLYEVFI1by4n/iWuHSld7X7txDSx97 gz/+N0UXB7cYtP3zaX9FcP7DBc80b91FfDSgYjYgF1iItcrBYyLxA9uXFMPnh1U2qvDi ENwniXAVmAsyNVK+EY8/yeAasOCRDheuvmYkMIFnFnmTOEr+HuVtyXM2PG5gMmvtAbcd mqpuz2eL/pYzfUm1PPB7PHgXAHf793IIt+EqtFZffr5aDzqbYmSHdeUXs17xdn0Gx4pv Xm/2KXNL83iIItT3MDCI6dXo8vbvnBFWKp2/Q/2KIH33CqdHluzVDmWb35GTthjjqgUY +Vmg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZ6BUnnbcl5Ny5MuML5LAAzZH+Xr5bi76nRu/Qylv06mFxyuQdZ 8KxXpKodHM3RsuyT/HapDJQQIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHEOIM4pRuXNjatx8qUgzwx3oFRUQNp6z68zKQ81/UC1tpGkJtZYVoZe6IvFeUZpc20mYkuwA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:11d0:b0:1b5:b90:1190 with SMTP id q16-20020a17090311d000b001b50b901190mr94063plh.28.1689114723201; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:2d:3:8944:7c0b:5d4e:f65b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ij12-20020a170902ab4c00b001b84cd8814bsm2488045plb.65.2023.07.11.15.32.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:31:58 -0700 From: Isaac Manjarres To: Mark Brown Cc: Russell King , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Saravana Kannan , Tomeu Vizoso , Ulf Hansson , Marek Szyprowski , Aidan MacDonald , Amit Pundir , John Stultz , stable@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , kernel-team@android.com, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regmap-irq: Fix out-of-bounds access when allocating config buffers Message-ID: References: <20230711193059.2480971-1-isaacmanjarres@google.com> <8e5fba54-9ec7-45a7-8dd6-6ea63d853907@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:24:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:11:22PM -0700, Isaac Manjarres wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 08:50:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Please think hard before including complete backtraces in upstream > > > reports, they are very large and contain almost no useful information > > > relative to their size so often obscure the relevant content in your > > > message. If part of the backtrace is usefully illustrative (it often is > > > for search engines if nothing else) then it's usually better to pull out > > > the relevant sections. > > > Thanks for your feedback. I'll go ahead and send out a new version of > > the patch with a trimmed down commit message. > > It's OK, I did some local edits myself. Thanks Mark! --Isaac