From: Deborah Brouwer <deborah.brouwer@collabora.com>
To: Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>
Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@outlook.com, BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: bt8xx: Fix a possible data race in buffer_queue()
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 05:36:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKLAxKKc1z53Bm+S@db550> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230628071951.1011421-1-islituo@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 03:19:51PM +0800, Tuo Li wrote:
> The variable btv->loop_irq is often protected by the lock btv->s_lock when
> is accessed. Here is an example in bttv_irq_timeout():
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&btv->s_lock,flags);
> ...
> btv->loop_irq = 0;
> ...
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&btv->s_lock,flags);
>
> However, it is accessed without holding the lock btv->s_lock in
> buffer_queue():
>
> btv->loop_irq |= 1;
>
> And thus a data race can occur.
> To fix this possible data race, a lock and unlock pair is added when
> accessing the variable btv->loop_irq in buffer_queue().
hmm I am not sure why buffer_queue() didn't bother holding the
btv->s_lock but in the new version of the bttv driver that I have
been working on, the btv->s_lock is always held before changing
the loop_irq value.
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/cover/cover.1682995256.git.deborah.brouwer@collabora.com/
When the bttv driver is converted to vb2, and the work is almost done,
the old buffer_queue() is totally eliminated, so I don't think it would
make sense to apply this patch now.
>
> Reported-by: BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c b/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
> index 734f02b91aa3..241c51951627 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
> @@ -1617,13 +1617,16 @@ buffer_queue(struct videobuf_queue *q, struct videobuf_buffer *vb)
> struct bttv_buffer *buf = container_of(vb,struct bttv_buffer,vb);
> struct bttv_fh *fh = q->priv_data;
> struct bttv *btv = fh->btv;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&btv->s_lock,flags);
> buf->vb.state = VIDEOBUF_QUEUED;
> list_add_tail(&buf->vb.queue,&btv->capture);
> if (!btv->curr.frame_irq) {
> btv->loop_irq |= 1;
> bttv_set_dma(btv, 0x03);
> }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&btv->s_lock,flags);
> }
>
> static void buffer_release(struct videobuf_queue *q, struct videobuf_buffer *vb)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-28 7:19 [PATCH] media: bt8xx: Fix a possible data race in buffer_queue() Tuo Li
2023-07-03 12:36 ` Deborah Brouwer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZKLAxKKc1z53Bm+S@db550 \
--to=deborah.brouwer@collabora.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@outlook.com \
--cc=bass@buaa.edu.cn \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=islituo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox