From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@quicinc.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] soundwire: fix enumeration completion
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 16:30:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKV-oXAWzRXnjXus@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <907ad7a3-3384-c0c4-90a9-5beab4cc45e0@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:53:17PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 7/5/23 14:30, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > The soundwire subsystem uses two completion structures that allow
> > drivers to wait for soundwire device to become enumerated on the bus and
> > initialised by their drivers, respectively.
> >
> > The code implementing the signalling is currently broken as it does not
> > signal all current and future waiters and also uses the wrong
> > reinitialisation function, which can potentially lead to memory
> > corruption if there are still waiters on the queue.
>
> That change sounds good, but I am not following the two paragraphs below.
>
> > Not signalling future waiters specifically breaks sound card probe
> > deferrals as codec drivers can not tell that the soundwire device is
> > already attached when being reprobed.
>
> What makes you say that? There is a test in the probe and the codec
> driver will absolutely be notified, see bus_type.c
>
> if (drv->ops && drv->ops->update_status) {
> ret = drv->ops->update_status(slave, slave->status);
> if (ret < 0)
> dev_warn(dev, "%s: update_status failed with status %d\n", __func__,
> ret);
> }
I'm talking about signalling the codec driver using the soundwire device
via the completion structs. Unless the underling device is detached and
reattached, trying to wait for completion a second time will currently
timeout instead of returning immediately.
This affects codecs like rt5682, which wait for completion in component
probe (see rt5682_probe()).
> > Some codec runtime PM
> > implementations suffer from similar problems as waiting for enumeration
> > during resume can also timeout despite the device already having been
> > enumerated.
>
> I am not following this either. Are you saying the wait_for_completion()
> times out because of the init_completion/reinit_completion confusion, or
> something else.
It times out because the completion counter is not saturated unless you
use complete_all().
Drivers that wait unconditionally in resume, will time out the second
time they are runtime resumed unless the underlying device has been
detached and reattached in the meantime (e.g. wsa881x_runtime_resume()).
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-05 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 12:30 [PATCH 0/8] ASoC/soundwire/qdsp6/wcd: fix leaks and probe deferral Johan Hovold
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] soundwire: fix enumeration completion Johan Hovold
2023-07-05 12:53 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-05 14:30 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2023-07-05 14:44 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] ASoC: qdsp6: audioreach: fix topology probe deferral Johan Hovold
2023-07-06 11:09 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix missing clsh ctrl error handling Johan Hovold
2023-07-06 11:09 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix resource leaks on component remove Johan Hovold
2023-07-06 11:09 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: " Johan Hovold
2023-07-06 11:09 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: codecs: wcd-mbhc-v2: " Johan Hovold
2023-07-06 11:09 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] ASoC: topology: suppress probe deferral errors Johan Hovold
2023-07-05 15:07 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-07-06 6:14 ` Johan Hovold
2023-07-06 7:25 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-07-10 12:01 ` Johan Hovold
2023-07-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] ASoC: core: " Johan Hovold
2023-07-10 8:53 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/8] ASoC/soundwire/qdsp6/wcd: fix leaks and probe deferral Vinod Koul
2023-07-11 20:44 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZKV-oXAWzRXnjXus@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bgoswami@quicinc.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rander.wang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox