public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Cc: "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Brian Cain" <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	"Kefeng Wang" <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Sunil V L" <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Anup Patel" <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Atish Patra" <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>, "Guo Ren" <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	"Xianting Tian" <xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
	"Li Zhengyu" <lizhengyu3@huawei.com>,
	"Jisheng Zhang" <jszhang@kernel.org>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	"Evan Green" <evan@rivosinc.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 3/9] riscv: add support for misaligned handling in S-mode
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 21:08:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKnCOs0uyzdt7UFf@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704140924.315594-4-cleger@rivosinc.com>

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 04:09:18PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> Misalignment handling is only supported for M-mode and uses direct
> accesses to user memory. in S-mode, this requires to use the
> get_user()/put_user() accessors. Implement load_u8(), store_u8() and
> get_insn() using these accessors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile           |   2 +-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c            |   7 --
>  arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> index 153864e4f399..79b8dafc699d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ obj-y	+= riscv_ksyms.o
>  obj-y	+= stacktrace.o
>  obj-y	+= cacheinfo.o
>  obj-y	+= patch.o
> +obj-y	+= traps_misaligned.o
>  obj-y	+= probes/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)	+= traps_misaligned.o

I think it would be better to combine this wath with "[PATCH 2/9] riscv: avoid
missing prototypes warning" from the series to avoid the breakage on commit 2/9.

Also, it would be a bit more clear of the intent.

>  obj-$(CONFIG_FPU)		+= fpu.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= smpboot.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= smp.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> index 7fcaf2fd27a1..b2fb2266fb83 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -149,12 +149,6 @@ DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_insn_illegal,
>  	SIGILL, ILL_ILLOPC, "illegal instruction");
>  DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_load_fault,
>  	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "load access fault");
> -#ifndef CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE
> -DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_load_misaligned,
> -	SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN, "Oops - load address misaligned");
> -DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_store_misaligned,
> -	SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN, "Oops - store (or AMO) address misaligned");
> -#else
>  
>  asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_load_misaligned(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> @@ -197,7 +191,6 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_store_misaligned(struct pt_regs
>  		irqentry_nmi_exit(regs, state);
>  	}
>  }
> -#endif
>  DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_store_fault,
>  	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "store (or AMO) access fault");
>  DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_s,
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> index 0cccac4822a8..9daed7d756ae 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> @@ -152,21 +152,25 @@
>  #define PRECISION_S 0
>  #define PRECISION_D 1
>  
> -static inline u8 load_u8(const u8 *addr)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE
> +static inline int load_u8(struct pt_regs *regs, const u8 *addr, u8 *r_val)
>  {
>  	u8 val;
>  
>  	asm volatile("lbu %0, %1" : "=&r" (val) : "m" (*addr));
> +	*r_val = val;
>  
> -	return val;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void store_u8(u8 *addr, u8 val)
> +static inline int store_u8(struct pt_regs *regs, u8 *addr, u8 val)
>  {
>  	asm volatile ("sb %0, %1\n" : : "r" (val), "m" (*addr));
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline ulong get_insn(ulong mepc)
> +static inline int get_insn(struct pt_regs *regs, ulong mepc, ulong *r_insn)
>  {
>  	register ulong __mepc asm ("a2") = mepc;
>  	ulong val, rvc_mask = 3, tmp;
> @@ -195,9 +199,87 @@ static inline ulong get_insn(ulong mepc)
>  	: [addr] "r" (__mepc), [rvc_mask] "r" (rvc_mask),
>  	  [xlen_minus_16] "i" (XLEN_MINUS_16));
>  
> -	return val;
> +	*r_insn = val;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int load_u8(struct pt_regs *regs, const u8 *addr, u8 *r_val)
> +{
> +	if (user_mode(regs)) {
> +		return __get_user(*r_val, addr);
> +	} else {
> +		*r_val = *addr;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  }
>  
> +static inline int store_u8(struct pt_regs *regs, u8 *addr, u8 val)
> +{
> +	if (user_mode(regs)) {
> +		return __put_user(val, addr);
> +	} else {
> +		*addr = val;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +#define __read_insn(regs, insn, insn_addr)		\
> +({							\
> +	int __ret;					\
> +							\
> +	if (user_mode(regs)) {				\
> +		__ret = __get_user(insn, insn_addr);	\
> +	} else {					\
> +		insn = *insn_addr;			\
> +		__ret = 0;				\
> +	}						\
> +							\
> +	__ret;						\
> +})
> +
> +static inline int get_insn(struct pt_regs *regs, ulong epc, ulong *r_insn)
> +{
> +	ulong insn = 0;
> +
> +	if (epc & 0x2) {
> +		ulong tmp = 0;
> +		u16 __user *insn_addr = (u16 __user *)epc;
> +
> +		if (__read_insn(regs, insn, insn_addr))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		/* __get_user() uses regular "lw" which sign extend the loaded
> +		 * value make sure to clear higher order bits in case we "or" it
> +		 * below with the upper 16 bits half.
> +		 */
> +		insn &= GENMASK(15, 0);
> +		if ((insn & __INSN_LENGTH_MASK) != __INSN_LENGTH_32) {
> +			*r_insn = insn;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		insn_addr++;
> +		if (__read_insn(regs, tmp, insn_addr))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		*r_insn = (tmp << 16) | insn;
> +
> +		return 0;
> +	} else {
> +		u32 __user *insn_addr = (u32 __user *)epc;
> +
> +		if (__read_insn(regs, insn, insn_addr))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		if ((insn & __INSN_LENGTH_MASK) == __INSN_LENGTH_32) {
> +			*r_insn = insn;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		insn &= GENMASK(15, 0);
> +		*r_insn = insn;
> +
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  union reg_data {
>  	u8 data_bytes[8];
>  	ulong data_ulong;
> @@ -208,10 +290,13 @@ int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	union reg_data val;
>  	unsigned long epc = regs->epc;
> -	unsigned long insn = get_insn(epc);
> -	unsigned long addr = csr_read(mtval);
> +	unsigned long insn;
> +	unsigned long addr = regs->badaddr;

Could your commit messages talk a bit about the change from using mtval to
regs->badaddr?  Will this sill work in M-mode? I think so, but it would be good
to explain the change.

>  	int i, fp = 0, shift = 0, len = 0;
>  
> +	if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn))
> +		return -1;
> +
>  	regs->epc = 0;
>  
>  	if ((insn & INSN_MASK_LW) == INSN_MATCH_LW) {
> @@ -275,8 +360,10 @@ int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	}
>  
>  	val.data_u64 = 0;
> -	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> -		val.data_bytes[i] = load_u8((void *)(addr + i));
> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> +		if (load_u8(regs, (void *)(addr + i), &val.data_bytes[i]))
> +			return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (fp)
>  		return -1;
> @@ -291,10 +378,13 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	union reg_data val;
>  	unsigned long epc = regs->epc;
> -	unsigned long insn = get_insn(epc);
> -	unsigned long addr = csr_read(mtval);
> +	unsigned long insn;
> +	unsigned long addr = regs->badaddr;
>  	int i, len = 0;
>  
> +	if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn))
> +		return -1;
> +
>  	regs->epc = 0;
>  
>  	val.data_ulong = GET_RS2(insn, regs);
> @@ -328,8 +418,10 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> -		store_u8((void *)(addr + i), val.data_bytes[i]);
> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> +		if (store_u8(regs, (void *)(addr + i), val.data_bytes[i]))
> +			return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	regs->epc = epc + INSN_LEN(insn);
>  
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-08 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-04 14:09 [RFC V2 PATCH 0/9] Add support to handle misaligned accesses in S-mode Clément Léger
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 1/9] riscv: remove unused functions in traps_misaligned.c Clément Léger
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 2/9] riscv: avoid missing prototypes warning Clément Léger
2023-07-08 19:34   ` Stafford Horne
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 3/9] riscv: add support for misaligned handling in S-mode Clément Léger
2023-07-08 20:08   ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 4/9] riscv: report perf event for misaligned fault Clément Léger
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 5/9] riscv: add support for sysctl unaligned_enabled control Clément Léger
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 6/9] riscv: add support for SBI misalignment trap delegation Clément Léger
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 7/9] riscv: report misaligned accesses emulation to hwprobe Clément Léger
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 8/9] riscv: add support for PR_SET_UNALIGN and PR_GET_UNALIGN Clément Léger
2023-07-04 14:09 ` [RFC V2 PATCH 9/9] riscv: add floating point insn support to misaligned access emulation Clément Léger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZKnCOs0uyzdt7UFf@antec \
    --to=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=bcain@quicinc.com \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lizhengyu3@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox