From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: "Georg Müller" <georgmueller@gmx.net>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf probe: fix regression introduced by switch to die_get_decl_file
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:44:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKwLKXL6rkoShDNc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c85c4d6-7097-bc0a-d0ca-ebe234d63ece@leemhuis.info>
Em Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 02:32:28PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) escreveu:
> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
> for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
>
> Masami, Arnaldo, what's up here? Georg (who is not a regular
> contributor) afaics found a regression in a commit you
> authored/committed and even provided a patch-set to fix it (the first
> one nearly four weeks ago, e.g. before the merge window started), but
> hasn't received much support from your side to get this in. Could you
> please look into this to get this cleared up? Or am I missing something
> and progress to fix this has been made?
I'm back from a 2 week vacation, going thru the pile, probably fell thru
the cracks and Namyung, that processed patches while I was away didn't
notice it either.
I'm checking,
- Arnaldo
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>
>
> On 28.06.23 10:45, Georg Müller wrote:
> > When switching from dwarf_decl_file() to die_get_decl_file(), a regression
> > was introduced when having a binary where the DWARF info is split to
> > multiple CUs. It is not possible to add probes to certain functions.
> >
> > These patches introduce a testcase which shows the current regression
> > and a fix for the issue
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Georg Müller <georgmueller@gmx.net>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a00d5a5-7be7-ef8a-4044-9a16249fff25@gmx.net/
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Add testcase
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - start new thread
> > - add stable to cc
> >
> > Georg Müller (2):
> > perf probe: add test for regression introduced by switch to
> > die_get_decl_file
> > perf probe: read DWARF files from the correct CU
> >
> > .../shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 4 +-
> > 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh
> >
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
> >
> >
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-10 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-28 8:45 [PATCH v3 0/2] perf probe: fix regression introduced by switch to die_get_decl_file Georg Müller
2023-06-28 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf probe: add test for " Georg Müller
2023-06-28 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf probe: read DWARF files from the correct CU Georg Müller
2023-07-10 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] perf probe: fix regression introduced by switch to die_get_decl_file Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-07-10 13:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-07-10 13:49 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZKwLKXL6rkoShDNc@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=georgmueller@gmx.net \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox