From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B704DC001DE for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233024AbjGXKMD (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2023 06:12:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42186 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232849AbjGXKLp (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2023 06:11:45 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9EC59E7; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 03:04:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1690193062; x=1721729062; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+7lDUvLV9DwkybbWR5a1MfysHXrim31bgG1G2gwZpqA=; b=MrLOW4vKaA6Hn+g/dxGoZl1ggeG/L1CDaGAVs9LWNctTG1Ge64+d+2W4 X2gYgcRIm5cA89o7NVnN+iQKy7BnddDT52iZJybdeJdNEYX1T8aKrRV+9 P2MfvkMjXNVBD2uBf+l7HvexGbleFgsCacVN1mHE4OKP+XFwiOwcgGJbD T6n6e+v/gBsixpQhth0sygFyNviLBCtKZxMy3gZV7c3girSfUUzix6+t7 nxTVTZNw8U283i163ycTPqg4ZEr/ayVF0wq0cKrV091BK8e7/poDIQvwA aryiS59veyb523PNmuaDrP74gBpe6ZQlrGsANfsd/WdxpdV4ChbcftgK4 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10780"; a="367426153" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,228,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="367426153" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jul 2023 03:02:04 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10780"; a="972203238" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,228,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="972203238" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2023 03:01:55 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qNsO1-007gPp-36; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:01:53 +0300 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:01:53 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Stephen Boyd , Doug Brown , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michael Turquette , Duje =?utf-8?Q?Mihanovi=C4=87?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] clk: mmp: Switch to use struct u32_fract instead of custom one Message-ID: References: <20230724094838.32596-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230724094838.32596-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:48:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The struct mmp_clk_factor_tbl repeats the generic struct u32_fract. > Kill the custom one and use the generic one instead. Note, I have not tested this. And after testing you may incorporate this into your series if there is no objection. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko