From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Mike Looijmans" <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>,
"Andreas Helbech Kleist" <andreaskleist@gmail.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"Prabhakar Mahadev Lad" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: exc3000 - Simplify probe()
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:10:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLsCOj1t4JvG3SEp@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYCPR01MB593346FBBA320260A290EAFD8639A@TYCPR01MB5933.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 06:43:47AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Dmitry Torokhov,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: exc3000 - Simplify probe()
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:45:27PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: exc3000 - Simplify probe()
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 07:15:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:35:02PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The .device_get_match_data callbacks are missing for I2C and SPI
> > > > > > bus
> > > > subsystems.
> > > > > > Can you please throw some lights on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > It's the first time I've ever heard of that callback, I don't know
> > > > > why whoever added it wouldn't have done those buses in particular
> > > > > or if it just didn't happen. Try adding it and if it works send
> > the patches?
> > > >
> > > > I think there is a disconnect. Right now device_get_match_data
> > > > callbacks are part of fwnode_operations. I was proposing to add
> > > > another optional device_get_match_data callback to 'struct bus_type'
> > > > to allow individual buses control how match data is handled, before
> > > > (or after) jumping into the fwnode-backed device_get_match_data
> > callbacks.
> > >
> > > That is what implemented here [1] and [2] right?
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc2/source/drivers/spi/spi.c#L364
>
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc2/source/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c#L117
>
> > >
> > >
> > > First it check for fwnode-backed device_get_match_data callbacks and
> > > Fallback is bus-type based match.
> > >
> > > Looks like you are proposing to unify [1] and [2] and you want the
> > > logic to be other way around. ie, first bus-type match, then
> > > fwnode-backed callbacks?
> > >
> >
> > I do not have a strong preference for the ordering, i.e. I think it is
> > perfectly fine to do the generic fwnode-based lookup and if there is no
> > match have bus method called as a fallback,
>
> That involves a bit of work.
>
> const void *device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev);
>
> const struct i2c_device_id *i2c_match_id(const struct i2c_device_id *id,
> const struct i2c_client *client);
>
> const struct spi_device_id *spi_get_device_id(const struct spi_device *sdev);
>
> Basically, the bus-client driver(such as exc3000) needs to pass struct device
> and device_get_match_data after generic fwnode-based lookup,
> needs to find the bus type based on struct device and call a new generic
> void* bus_get_match_data(void*) callback, so that each bus interface
> can do a match.
Yes, something like this (which does not seem that involved to me...):
diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
index 8c40abed7852..cc0bf7bb6f3a 100644
--- a/drivers/base/property.c
+++ b/drivers/base/property.c
@@ -1277,7 +1277,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint);
const void *device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
{
- return fwnode_call_ptr_op(dev_fwnode(dev), device_get_match_data, dev);
+ const void *data;
+
+ data = fwnode_call_ptr_op(dev_fwnode(dev), device_get_match_data, dev);
+ if (!data && dev->bus && dev->bus->get_match_data)
+ data = dev->bus->get_match_data(dev);
+
+ return data;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_match_data);
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
index 60746652fd52..5fe47bc491a6 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
@@ -114,6 +114,26 @@ const struct i2c_device_id *i2c_match_id(const struct i2c_device_id *id,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_match_id);
+static const void *i2c_device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
+{
+ const struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
+ const struct i2c_driver *driver;
+ const struct i2c_device_id *match;
+
+ if (!dev->driver)
+ return NULL;
+
+ driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
+ if (!driver)
+ return NULL;
+
+ match = i2c_match_id(driver->id_table, client);
+ if (!match)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return (const void *)match->driver_data;
+}
+
const void *i2c_get_match_data(const struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct i2c_driver *driver = to_i2c_driver(client->dev.driver);
@@ -695,6 +715,7 @@ struct bus_type i2c_bus_type = {
.probe = i2c_device_probe,
.remove = i2c_device_remove,
.shutdown = i2c_device_shutdown,
+ .get_match_data = i2c_device_get_match_data,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_bus_type);
diff --git a/include/linux/device/bus.h b/include/linux/device/bus.h
index ae10c4322754..3f2cba28a1af 100644
--- a/include/linux/device/bus.h
+++ b/include/linux/device/bus.h
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ struct bus_type {
int (*dma_configure)(struct device *dev);
void (*dma_cleanup)(struct device *dev);
+ const void *(*get_match_data)(const struct device *dev);
+
const struct dev_pm_ops *pm;
const struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops;
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230717131756.240645-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
[not found] ` <20230717131756.240645-2-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
[not found] ` <ZLVlIPHdmEGdG5D1@google.com>
[not found] ` <OS0PR01MB592264ADC86061AB003048DD863BA@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <66228ad3-c087-418c-925f-b9fd4a60fb16@sirena.org.uk>
[not found] ` <ZLWIPPAfeR1+KbeH@google.com>
[not found] ` <OS0PR01MB59225D8CF3E96808DD776A8E863BA@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <ZLbbslBiIQXFWpmN@google.com>
2023-07-19 6:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: exc3000 - Simplify probe() Biju Das
2023-07-21 22:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2023-07-22 17:51 ` Biju Das
2023-07-23 1:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2023-07-23 6:05 ` Biju Das
2023-07-23 6:50 ` Biju Das
2023-07-23 20:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLsCOj1t4JvG3SEp@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=andreaskleist@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox