public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] irqdomain: Refactor error path in __irq_domain_alloc_fwnode()
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 23:12:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZM1bm2+/lyb+IH86@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84f2ea9ee0c08c8826c0f26c4a6291c9@kernel.org>

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 06:33:07PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2023-08-04 17:49, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > First of all, there is no need to call kasprintf() if the previous
> > allocation failed. Second, there is no need to call for kfree()
> > when we know that its parameter is NULL. Refactor the code accordingly.

...

> >  		n = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "irqchip@%pa", pa);
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> > -
> > -	if (!fwid || !n) {
> > +	if (!n) {
> >  		kfree(fwid);
> > -		kfree(n);
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	}
> 
> What are you trying to fix?

I'm not trying to fix anything (there is no such statement from me),
but I would think of some micro-optimization (speedup boot for
unnoticeable time? Dunno.).

> We have a common error handling path, which makes it easy to
> track the memory management. I don't think this sort of bike
> shedding adds much to the maintainability of this code.

Your call, of course, but I not often see in the kernel two or three attempts
to allocate some memory and have grouped check for the failure.

> Now if you have spotted an actual bug, I'm all ears.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-04 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-04 16:49 [PATCH v1 1/1] irqdomain: Refactor error path in __irq_domain_alloc_fwnode() Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-04 17:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-04 20:12   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-08-04 22:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-07 15:06       ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZM1bm2+/lyb+IH86@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox