From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] irqdomain: Refactor error path in __irq_domain_alloc_fwnode()
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 23:12:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZM1bm2+/lyb+IH86@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84f2ea9ee0c08c8826c0f26c4a6291c9@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 06:33:07PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2023-08-04 17:49, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > First of all, there is no need to call kasprintf() if the previous
> > allocation failed. Second, there is no need to call for kfree()
> > when we know that its parameter is NULL. Refactor the code accordingly.
...
> > n = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "irqchip@%pa", pa);
> > break;
> > }
> > -
> > - if (!fwid || !n) {
> > + if (!n) {
> > kfree(fwid);
> > - kfree(n);
> > return NULL;
> > }
>
> What are you trying to fix?
I'm not trying to fix anything (there is no such statement from me),
but I would think of some micro-optimization (speedup boot for
unnoticeable time? Dunno.).
> We have a common error handling path, which makes it easy to
> track the memory management. I don't think this sort of bike
> shedding adds much to the maintainability of this code.
Your call, of course, but I not often see in the kernel two or three attempts
to allocate some memory and have grouped check for the failure.
> Now if you have spotted an actual bug, I'm all ears.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 16:49 [PATCH v1 1/1] irqdomain: Refactor error path in __irq_domain_alloc_fwnode() Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-04 17:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-04 20:12 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-08-04 22:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-07 15:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZM1bm2+/lyb+IH86@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox