From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Goran <goran.brkuljan@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Power Management <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: XPS 17 9730 runs significantly warmer on Kernel 6.5-rc3 compared to Kernel 6.4.3
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:31:12 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMMaYLcc5G4KSVyf@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4aaf1d3d-2ab7-2d3a-f597-a1741bf699d6@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6064 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:25:19PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
>
> > On my new XPS 17 9730 laptop, I recently installed the Kernel 6.5-rc3. I noticed, however, that during its operation, the laptop was getting significantly warmer than before. I did some analysis using the 'stress' tool to measure and compare the difference in CPU temperatures between Kernel 6.4.3 and Kernel 6.5-rc3. Here are my results:
> >
> > OS: Ubuntu 23.10
> > CPU: i7-13700H
> >
> > kernel 6.4.3:
> >
> > Initial CPU temperature:
> > coretemp-isa-0000
> > Core 0: +47.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 4: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 8: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 12: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 16: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 20: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 24: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 25: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 26: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 27: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 28: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 29: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 30: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 31: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Stressing CPU for 30 seconds...
> > stress: info: [4858] dispatching hogs: 14 cpu, 0 io, 0 vm, 0 hdd
> > stress: info: [4858] successful run completed in 30s
> > CPU temperature immediately after stress test:
> > coretemp-isa-0000
> > Core 0: +67.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 4: +76.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 8: +69.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 12: +77.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 16: +69.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 20: +76.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 24: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 25: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 26: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 27: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 28: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 29: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 30: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 31: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Test ended at: Tue Jul 25 01:10:16 PM CEST 2023
> >
> >
> > kernel 6.5-rc-3:
> >
> > Initial CPU temperature:
> > coretemp-isa-0000
> > Core 0: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 4: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 8: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 12: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 16: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 20: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 24: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 25: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 26: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 27: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 28: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 29: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 30: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 31: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Stressing CPU for 30 seconds...
> > stress: info: [11146] dispatching hogs: 14 cpu, 0 io, 0 vm, 0 hdd
> > stress: info: [11146] successful run completed in 30s
> > CPU temperature immediately after stress test:
> > coretemp-isa-0000
> > Core 0: +84.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 4: +97.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 8: +87.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 12: +100.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 16: +86.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 20: +99.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 24: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 25: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 26: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 27: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 28: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 29: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 30: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Core 31: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
> > Test ended at: Tue Jul 25 01:05:42 PM CEST 2023
> >
> > I tested few times with different setup and CPU temp on 6.5-rc3 is always higher especially when stressing with fewer cores.
>
> See Bugzilla for the full thread.
>
> Goran: On Tuesday, I asked you to perform bisection. Any update on it?
>
> Anyway, I'm adding this regression to regzbot:
>
> #regzbot introduced: v6.4..v6.5-rc3 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703
> #regzbot title: significant temperature increase on XPS 17 9730
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703
>
Oops, I accidentally duped this. My email client was stuck sending it
(but got delivered anyway), thus:
#regzbot dup-of: https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/107f05b8-0104-501c-130c-4f89f3f8a628@gmail.com/
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 14:25 Fwd: XPS 17 9730 runs significantly warmer on Kernel 6.5-rc3 compared to Kernel 6.4.3 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28 1:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2023-07-28 7:00 ` Bagas Sanjaya
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-27 14:24 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28 13:42 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
[not found] ` <CANhdOJEq-+KaMv=TX7E4ggf7rm456ibha2W_+Y5m1580ngCw_A@mail.gmail.com>
2023-07-28 19:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMMaYLcc5G4KSVyf@debian.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=goran.brkuljan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox