From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0D2C00528 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230440AbjHGPAP (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:00:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34108 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230050AbjHGPAM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:00:12 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CEBA9F for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 08:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1691420411; x=1722956411; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=aiPJPEq0T6L9AyetiOa3BfDQ5zox6rdHDOUrfreuhUI=; b=K/QJFRfhAP5vRKyQtwwDl5kvHkysV5o0/uD+jM8FNdUODT853cw//rjT VZfqHaw6h7W09wngi2t8WVDGvY6ueegJbap8wsnTxyIssxBYf8lnHw4wB F3Myj8Fy8QwkPWpD1KdPI4p1DtGV9oGsmNk5A2/y0hFmFn6veeYQIzVMt LPKlWaE7iws130RMnyhey4nU6XP62+XKQ6YQkEFkW4Dice4kw0nB21bM5 Pq29UVTybWNl9ZK5LLm/q7M7ntW6zPf5EW4Ya8MnIo9evSiRnBBFtVXF1 egiNgQmdkS7h3LcirS790xlsX51pwPT8tucnN2UcU/TVAXgWvuyXI6vz2 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10795"; a="360651463" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,262,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="360651463" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2023 08:00:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10795"; a="760526738" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,262,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="760526738" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2023 08:00:07 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qT1iI-00GPvH-0W; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 18:00:06 +0300 Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:00:05 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Petr Mladek , Marco Elver , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt , Rasmus Villemoes , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] lib/vsprintf: Sort headers alphabetically Message-ID: References: <20230805175027.50029-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20230805175027.50029-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20230807145302.GD907732@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230807145302.GD907732@google.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:53:02PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (23/08/07 16:31), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > I am sorry but I will not accept this patch unless there > > is a wide consensus that this makes sense. > > I completely agree with Petr. > > I found it a little bit hard to be enthusiastic about > this patch in particular and _probably_ about this series > in general, sorry Andy. What to do with _headers_ that include kernel.h for no reason other than sprintf.h (as an example)? Your suggestion, please? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko