public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Replace s1_cfg with cdtab_cfg
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:04:35 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNTSU1Jm6OsauygC@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810094323.GC5365@willie-the-truck>

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:43:33AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 05:33:53PM +0800, Michael Shavit wrote:
> > > > > Sounds a lot like the existing s1fmt field. Can we keep it?
> > > >
> > > > If you are OK with the dead code, I don't object. But let's put it in
> > > > the struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg.
> > >
> > > Ok, we have a deal!
> > 
> > What dead code? Is the deal here that we keep the field, but still
> > infer the value to write from (cd_table->l1_desc == null) in
> > arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent??
> 
> Keep the field and write it directly when populating the ste (i.e. don't
> infer anything), but the field moves into 'struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg'.

Yes - the 'dead code' is that we introduce storage for a field that is
always a known constant (STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2).

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-08 17:11 [PATCH v5 0/9] Refactor the SMMU's CD table ownership Michael Shavit
2023-08-08 17:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move ctx_desc out of s1_cfg Michael Shavit
2023-08-08 17:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Replace s1_cfg with cdtab_cfg Michael Shavit
2023-08-09 13:49   ` Will Deacon
2023-08-09 13:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 14:55       ` Will Deacon
2023-08-09 15:08         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 16:22           ` Will Deacon
2023-08-09 16:26             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 16:27               ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10  9:33                 ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-10  9:43                   ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10 12:04                     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-08-10 17:15                       ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-10 17:32                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 17:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Encapsulate ctx_desc_cfg init in alloc_cd_tables Michael Shavit
2023-08-08 17:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: move stall_enabled to the cd table Michael Shavit
2023-08-08 17:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor write_ctx_desc Michael Shavit
2023-08-09 13:50   ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10  9:15     ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-10 14:40       ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10 15:39         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-15  5:20           ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-15 11:22             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-15 12:03               ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-15 12:30                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-15 12:36                   ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-15 12:56                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-15  5:04       ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-15 10:19         ` Will Deacon
2023-08-15 11:40           ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-08 17:12 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move CD table to arm_smmu_master Michael Shavit
2023-08-09 13:50   ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10  9:23     ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-10 14:38       ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10  9:45     ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-10 14:34       ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10 14:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-15 12:10   ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-08 17:12 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Cleanup arm_smmu_domain_finalise Michael Shavit
2023-08-08 17:12 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Skip cd sync if CD table isn't active Michael Shavit
2023-08-09 13:50   ` Will Deacon
2023-08-10  8:34     ` Michael Shavit
2023-08-10 16:27       ` Will Deacon
2023-08-08 17:12 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Rename cdcfg to cd_table Michael Shavit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNTSU1Jm6OsauygC@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox