From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C575C41513 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 12:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236484AbjHOMSR (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2023 08:18:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232002AbjHOMRo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2023 08:17:44 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DF0171B; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 05:17:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 37FCHHZL005336; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:17:17 +0200 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:17:17 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Zhangjin Wu Cc: arnd@arndb.de, david.laight@aculab.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, tanyuan@tinylab.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] tools/nolibc: fix up size inflate regression Message-ID: References: <20230813090037.GE8237@1wt.eu> <20230813133944.19604-1-falcon@tinylab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230813133944.19604-1-falcon@tinylab.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 09:39:44PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > And we're done, you can then keep the simplified __sysret() macro for all > > other call places. > > > > Now, this issue is near to the end ;-) I've now pushed the simplified fix (without changing the SET_ERRNO() macro, enough last minute breaking changes for now) in branch 20230815-for-6.6-2. The tests pass and riscv/loongarch are even very slightly smaller than before (~8 bytes) but again that doesn't count as it depends on how the compiler decides to arrange if/else branches. I'll let Shuah know about these late fixes. Regards, Willy