From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Z qiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcutorture: Traverse possible cpu to set maxcpu in rcu_nocb_toggle()
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:24:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZO25SDat3cd6opQ7@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16F11103-75C4-4DCE-8272-D619ECAA96BD@joelfernandes.org>
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 05:51:09PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> I think the issue is the loop later in the function does
> not try to toggle cpus that came online too late.
>
> So it does not test offloading on all CPUs just because max got updated too
> late.
Right, and therefore for_each_possible_cpu() or for_each_present_cpu()
should be fine to iterate since it's ok to try to toggle an offline CPU.
>
> One fix could be to periodically check in the loop if a new cpu at maxcpu + 1
> ever got onlined. If it did, update the maxcpu.
Is it worth the complication though?
Thanks.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-29 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 8:42 [PATCH] rcutorture: Traverse possible cpu to set maxcpu in rcu_nocb_toggle() Zqiang
2023-08-24 8:59 ` Z qiang
2023-08-24 13:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-08-25 2:28 ` Z qiang
2023-08-26 1:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-08-26 6:13 ` Z qiang
2023-08-26 13:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-08-28 15:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-28 21:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-08-29 9:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-08-29 10:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-08-29 12:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-09-01 14:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-24 8:41 Zqiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZO25SDat3cd6opQ7@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox