public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
To: <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	<dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>, <bristot@redhat.com>,
	<vschneid@redhat.com>, <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq_is_decayed() on !SMP
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:29:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOK92_xLVsMmIEDE@swlinux02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230818132148.2237811-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>

Hi Chengming,

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 09:21:48PM +0800, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote:
> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> 
> We don't need to maintain per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list on !SMP, since
> it's used for cfs_rq load tracking & balance on SMP.
> 
> But sched debug interface use it to print per-cfs_rq stats, which
> maybe better to change to use walk_tg_tree_from() instead.
> 
> This patch just fix the !SMP version cfs_rq_is_decayed(), so the
> per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list is also maintained correctly on !SMP,
> to fix the warning in assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq().
> 
> Fixes: 0a00a354644e ("sched/fair: Delete useless condition in tg_unthrottle_up()")
> Reported-by: Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Thanks for the quick patch!

Tested-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>

Best regards,
Leo

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-21  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-18  9:35 PROBLEM: LTP cfs_bandwidth01 test bumped into SCHED_WARN_ON after de-selecting CONFIG_SMP Leo Liang
2023-08-18 11:35 ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq_is_decayed() on !SMP chengming.zhou
2023-08-18 12:25   ` Vincent Guittot
2023-08-18 13:17     ` Chengming Zhou
2023-08-18 13:21 ` [PATCH v2] " chengming.zhou
2023-08-21  1:29   ` Leo Liang [this message]
2023-08-21 11:59   ` Vincent Guittot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-13 13:20 chengming.zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZOK92_xLVsMmIEDE@swlinux02 \
    --to=ycliang@andestech.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox