Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] pinctrl: sprd: Fix the incorrect mask and shift definition

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 01:51:42PM +0800, Linhua Xu wrote:
> From: Linhua Xu <Linhua.Xu@unisoc.com>
> 
> Pull-up and pull-down are mutually exclusive. When setting one of them,
> the bit of the other needs to be clear. Now, there are cases where pull-up
> and pull-down are set at the same time in the code, thus fix them.

...

>  #define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN			BIT(2)
> -#define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN_MASK		0x1
> +#define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN_MASK		GENMASK(1, 0)
>  #define SLEEP_PULL_DOWN_SHIFT		2
>  
>  #define PULL_DOWN			BIT(6)
> -#define PULL_DOWN_MASK			0x1
> +#define PULL_DOWN_MASK			(GENMASK(1, 0) | BIT(6))
>  #define PULL_DOWN_SHIFT			6
>  
>  #define SLEEP_PULL_UP			BIT(3)
> -#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_MASK		0x1
> -#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_SHIFT		3
> +#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_MASK		GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_SHIFT		2
>  
>  #define PULL_UP_4_7K			(BIT(12) | BIT(7))
>  #define PULL_UP_20K			BIT(7)
> -#define PULL_UP_MASK			0x21
> -#define PULL_UP_SHIFT			7
> +#define PULL_UP_MASK			(GENMASK(1, 0) | BIT(6))
> +#define PULL_UP_SHIFT			6

These look strange now.

So, SLEEP MASK doesn't cover bits 2 and 3.
I believe you should have

#define SLEEP_PULL_UP_DOWN_MASK		GENMASK(3, 2)

The other even weirder with this BIT(6) there.

In the similar way:

#define PULL_UP_DOWN_MASK		GENMASK(7, 6)


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko