From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F618CA0FFE for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237212AbjIEQDy (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:03:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56242 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1354119AbjIEJlR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2023 05:41:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3AD1AD; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 02:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-31c5a2e8501so1910688f8f.0; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 02:41:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693906871; x=1694511671; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QgJx92vjXTkTpttBpTwFSL3+GPVEdvVno8ObySBYzAw=; b=QqubKl5QTeK7ObYraHju3pKiAFttdWqdcX110ZNsh8VJpxt/LrPGR3+8DM90TRAI3J MsFrgP3tJZFMx5LHxV5L7hN6HQPgx5QmrrmS0mfMQ+gqs1Ix/K2+3NkTPerspH+Kbaob Om5TgOt2HV2GyJxL2vBriagyj4sEOY7uJ8DsMSyaAV4hLaBNLUxUxiXkB0+DOL7zdRAH CG0wVaUFgxUaACzc2UH8g7nlkC+PtMyppXZ5FU6NHLkdCM7/oQ+BiaMZ7AtUFAXvE7T4 DZMgu25b/tr/niBAzk9cjP99NGBOiIVzzEKsCbjoScfbi5KQBJW7OOmf4GY4DJCxaAKE QePA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693906871; x=1694511671; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=QgJx92vjXTkTpttBpTwFSL3+GPVEdvVno8ObySBYzAw=; b=FLldPi9pogELrGCwrXsASbaNfhn84h4A448946sjNqmIBYJkuacgEFh8NPYrxIgYKi hFg4fclk3zur65i+HotIkWeKXGUPHvCYCttj2Cr+2XTlsVyOD2i//mqPstN9BOIYs91h 21jvyGr2YXmlW+w4WM1f21okZGsk8JKtBLhdNAktQivKSeFL4puOjw3zTYGYyh2bOmGM 6MDfk6wIiUxNqrZ4MQkeiCp/zp249sQRJM7hoY5JxRClkyT1XnyQrRBnH68l8HI7Jv4H DBb8353UwNiQMy3Konc00iHCE3Co4Co3x/uTbpRyLzlpVXllkuVBxZftsDgGi8IVB5xr oBsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy3g1SCIkHuPBORkx26CAlxebyvIWU+uoiFpf0xgxoF2LW7MBw8 /YCQciqyKA76l1JahB81/T0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGoWSR2aqZbmIZ7hgg8jVBiWpsSfPlwPPGJaYvM/yrDW64biTEHWOw+vteZXDnVn1ma2BPxaQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ff8f:0:b0:314:1ca4:dbd9 with SMTP id j15-20020adfff8f000000b003141ca4dbd9mr8028088wrr.27.1693906871394; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 02:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m6-20020adfa3c6000000b0031f300a4c26sm11812954wrb.93.2023.09.05.02.41.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Sep 2023 02:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:41:09 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.4 00/32] 6.4.15-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230904182947.899158313@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230904182947.899158313@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 07:29:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.4.15 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Build test (gcc version 12.3.1 20230829): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 70 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4940 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4953 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4954 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip