From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts/setlocalversion: also consider annotated tags of the form vx.y.z-${file_localversion}
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 11:19:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPtlxmdIJXOe0sEy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804120536.2339722-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Commit 6ab7e1f95e96 ("setlocalversion: use only the correct release
> tag for git-describe") was absolutely correct to limit which annotated
> tags would be used to compute the -01234-gabcdef suffix. Otherwise, if
> some random annotated tag exists closer to HEAD than the vX.Y.Z one,
> the commit count would be too low.
>
> However, since the version string always includes the
> ${file_localversion} part, now the problem is that the count can be
> too high. For example, building an 6.4.6-rt8 kernel with a few patches
> on top, I currently get
>
> $ make -s kernelrelease
> 6.4.6-rt8-00128-gd78b7f406397
>
> But those 128 commits include the 100 commits that are in
> v6.4.6..v6.4.6-rt8, so this is somewhat misleading.
>
> Amend the logic so that, in addition to the linux-next consideration,
> the script also looks for a tag corresponding to the 6.4.6-rt8 part of
> what will become the `uname -r` string. With this patch (so 29 patches
> on top of v6.4.6-rt8), one instead gets
>
> $ make -s kernelrelease
> 6.4.6-rt8-00029-gd533209291a2
>
> While there, note that the line
>
> git describe --exact-match --match=$tag $tag 2>/dev/null
>
> obviously asks if $tag is an annotated tag, but it does not actually
> tell if the commit pointed to has any relation to HEAD. So remove both
> uses of --exact-match, and instead just ask if the description
> generated is identical to the tag we provided. Since we then already
> have the result of
>
> git describe --match=$tag
>
> we also end up reducing the number of times we invoke "git describe".
Dropping "--exact-match" is resulting in unnacceptable latencies for me. I don't
understand what this is trying to do well enough to make a suggestion, but something
has to change.
E.g. on my build box, a single `git describe --match=v6.5` takes ~8.5 seconds,
whereas a complete from-scratch kernel build takes <30 seconds, and an incremental
build takes <2 seconds. When build testing to-be-applied changes, I compile each
commit ~15 times (different x86 configs plus one for each other KVM architecture),
which makes the ~8.5 second delay beyond painful.
And for actual testing, I can do an incremental build and boot into a VM in under
20 seconds, a multi-second delay is extremely painful there as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-08 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 12:05 [PATCH v2] scripts/setlocalversion: also consider annotated tags of the form vx.y.z-${file_localversion} Rasmus Villemoes
2023-08-05 15:26 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-09-08 18:19 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-09-08 22:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2023-09-08 23:21 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPtlxmdIJXOe0sEy@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox