From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D4CCA0EED for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235985AbjILOlP (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:41:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235901AbjILOlM (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:41:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EFB310D for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-577a98f78b2so455662a12.3 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:41:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1694529668; x=1695134468; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7IA9vO5OF4PfvbjWyLsSgk3yi/uHzp9q+67eqvoiYFs=; b=ccSMZ1+gT7HzhJ83pd8JAaRBvIuyeNDQP3gNephwYBViaMutUkRqgRMNAmj/kQYzQk 3pqX4mBv9mwWAv45zfyS3u+KVn05SxE7tCqRKNJzEuz+A956jEzehUiAQfvjQhIh4UKJ K9SHR7F7DmM5izZL2oNgPgzHbuXQtwCzUHrlLbHlP0a5nCwVKRZioZTTXbM3gehporUs hMPv+JA9KskKPBJKDn+h3cHfWw5laaJ8m+HeDM8lxUrvQwQYT85LOMVJRuVajAKs+f0b oEjWnkA//Y55uXGoATRNrtFK/AwGRvfryMr3y5vqwxbDs9a+ebgHinicC14q4WcGn9bl VaAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694529668; x=1695134468; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7IA9vO5OF4PfvbjWyLsSgk3yi/uHzp9q+67eqvoiYFs=; b=q3W8KENZJ1OTX9SI8WYMI+aJeBPY8ppiScOAo7d26XmeOFnWDUT5imfL9lVZG9AWDg npW9GG7rWBiVdq9k74UfBPDtVx2wm657VVOBE+IMTMa0oUoD713NDopelfoauqukoIT2 RlENx+qXtRqaZF9Ef+RNtzS+8+QGWcmL0IkWNNLSGkeuQj3xM3s9gIkPltEQ3rc/Og6o IEWqDFLO49D0fAsX3qknWed55ugBGuJsPO0eby+FeiXUwGBz5hPj5p8JEi9XIysSf1w+ meuHwWPeV2imKyHvrLibI2W+RBqUoKeTdsqShHNHjSoYpBK5+s0GBWWVsLGqyhM+H13P xg7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSJ3TrzvttBiKmO805clHrEdGKV0sNMuOltJQ/BFj2mAskKrR+ pzcXRLJqJ3i+MXrgHsH/PMDhLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGI9zf7neD/ytF0XaIRN6SetT6z4G2tT486Bd7sTiE6fcv43FJe/iFhqQFbhtCjZimu2u4lgw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:909:b0:271:a9b2:5162 with SMTP id bo9-20020a17090b090900b00271a9b25162mr9472055pjb.27.1694529667739; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s ([2604:3d09:148c:c800:ed04:a14b:64d6:aece]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x3-20020a17090ab00300b00268b9862343sm5377469pjq.24.2023.09.12.07.41.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 08:41:04 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Iuliana Prodan Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam , "S.J. Wang" , Sascha Hauer , Bjorn Andersson , Shawn Guo , conor+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-imx , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team , LnxRevLi , Daniel Baluta , Mpuaudiosw , "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP Message-ID: References: <20230911224452.15739-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com> <20230911224452.15739-3-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com> <67de5706-d966-dd71-85c3-c95bc1b72733@linaro.org> <32287c0a-e3c1-e474-3c90-913fe2c79879@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:51:42PM +0300, Iuliana Prodan wrote: > On 9/12/2023 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 12/09/2023 10:49, Iuliana Prodan wrote: > > > > > Should I test this on other tree(s)? > > > > You test the patch on the tree you send it. What is the point to test it > > > > on some old code, cherry-pick with bugs and then send? > > > > > > > > If you have cross-tree dependencies between subsystem, isn't linux-next > > > > for this? > > > TBH, I don't know, that's why I asked. > > > > > > For sure one patch is for remoteproc. > > > For the other, I don't know who will pick it, but I'll tested on > > > linux-next, as you suggested. > > MAINTAINERS file (and get_maintainers.pl) will tell you. Specifically, > > this does not look really related to remoteproc patch, so it should not > > be together in one patchset. > > Hi Mathieu, > > I need to send a v2 - to fix the dtsi missing bracket on patch 2. > So, should I keep the 2 patches together or send them separately? > Marco is already aware of this patchset so I would keep them together. > Thanks, > Iulia > > >