From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] selftests: futex: remove duplicate unneeded defines
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 22:25:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR8bn/UDLypbUhJT@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51273ffa-e323-44e8-8a93-bc04ee356df0@collabora.com>
* Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 10/3/23 1:46 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Kselftests are kernel tests and must be build with kernel headers from
> >> same source version. These duplicate defines should automatically
> >> picked up from kernel headers. Use KHDR_INCLUDES to add kernel header
> >> files.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../selftests/futex/include/futextest.h | 22 -------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/futextest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/futextest.h
> >> index ddbcfc9b7bac4..59f66af3a6d10 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/futextest.h
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/futextest.h
> >> @@ -25,28 +25,6 @@
> >> typedef volatile u_int32_t futex_t;
> >> #define FUTEX_INITIALIZER 0
> >>
> >> -/* Define the newer op codes if the system header file is not up to date. */
> >> -#ifndef FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET
> >> -#define FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET 9
> >> -#endif
> >> -#ifndef FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET
> >> -#define FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET 10
> >> -#endif
> >> -#ifndef FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI
> >> -#define FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI 11
> >> -#endif
> >> -#ifndef FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI
> >> -#define FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI 12
> >> -#endif
> >> -#ifndef FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI_PRIVATE
> >> -#define FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI_PRIVATE (FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI | \
> >> - FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG)
> >> -#endif
> >> -#ifndef FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI_PRIVATE
> >> -#define FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI_PRIVATE (FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI | \
> >> - FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG)
> >> -#endif
> >
> > AFAICT I cannot really pick this up into the locking tree as-is, as this patch
> > relies on the KHDR_INCLUDES change in patch #1, so that all self-tests get the
> > kernel headers included, correct?
> No this patch is self contained and doesn't depend on the patch #1.
> KHDR_INCLUDES was included several releases back in kselftest's Makefile
> and in kselftests of futex. Correct headers are being included already. In
> this patch, I'm removing just the un-needed dead code. Other patches were
> already picked up by other maintainers.
So the changelog does not match that characterization, it talks about
KHDR_INCLUDES in the present tense, and patch #1 adds the KHDR_INCLUDES,
which further suggested a dependency to me:
> >> Kselftests are kernel tests and must be build with kernel headers from
> >> same source version. These duplicate defines should automatically
> >> picked up from kernel headers. Use KHDR_INCLUDES to add kernel header
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> files.
^^^^^^
Could you please re-send it with the changelog updated that makes it clear
that this patch works fine standalone against current mainline kernels?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-05 7:37 [PATCH 1/6] selftests: capabilities: remove duplicate unneeded defines Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-08-05 7:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] selftests: clone3: remove duplicate defines Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-08-05 7:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] selftests: core: " Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-08-05 7:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] selftests: fchmodat2: remove duplicate unneeded defines Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-08-05 10:42 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2023-08-05 7:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests: firmware: " Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-08-05 7:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests: futex: " Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-10-03 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-05 12:06 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-10-05 20:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-10-06 8:27 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-10-06 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-08-22 8:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] selftests: capabilities: " Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-09-04 10:48 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-10-06 8:33 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-10-06 10:09 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-10-06 23:45 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZR8bn/UDLypbUhJT@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox