From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: test that userspace stack is in fact NX
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 21:30:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRxr79i5PAXRXjqr@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZRxmS/3nr6pDa1+z@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> Because not having NX in 2023 on any system that is threatened is a
> big security vulnerability in itself, and whether the vendor or owner
> intentionally did that or not doesn't really matter, and a failing
> kernel testcase will be the least of their problems.
BTW., it's also questionable whether the owner is *aware* of the fact that
NX is not available: what if some kernel debug option cleared the NX flag,
unintended, or there's some serious firmware bug?
However unlikely those situations might be, I think unconditionally warning
about NX not available is a very 2023 thing to do.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-01 16:31 [PATCH] x86_64: test that userspace stack is in fact NX Alexey Dobriyan
2023-10-02 13:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-03 13:03 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2023-10-02 14:23 ` Dave Hansen
2023-10-03 13:00 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2023-10-03 14:23 ` Dave Hansen
2023-10-03 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-03 19:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-10-03 20:46 ` Dave Hansen
2023-10-03 21:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-10-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v2] x86: " Alexey Dobriyan
2023-10-03 19:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-03 19:12 ` [tip: x86/mm] selftests/x86/mm: Add new " tip-bot2 for Alexey Dobriyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRxr79i5PAXRXjqr@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox