From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/11] KVM: x86: Make Hyper-V emulation optional
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 09:45:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZS1os-rIcdVu91Co@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877cnm8te9.fsf@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
>
> ...
>
> >> >
> >> > "Provides KVM support for emulating Microsoft Hypervisor (Hyper-V).
> >
> > I don't think we should put Hyper-V in parentheses, I haven't seen any documentation
> > that calls it "Microsoft Hypervisor", i.e. Hyper-V is the full and
> > proper name.
>
> Ha :-) From
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hyperv/1696010501-24584-1-git-send-email-nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com/
>
> """
> This series introduces support for creating and running guest machines
> while running on the Microsoft Hypervisor. [0]
> ...
> [0] "Hyper-V" is more well-known, but it really refers to the whole stack
> including the hypervisor and other components that run in Windows
> kernel and userspace.
> """
LOL indeed. :-)
> I'm fine with keeping the staus quo though :-)
>
> >
> >> > This makes KVM expose a set of paravirtualized interfaces,
> >
> > s/makes/allows, since KVM still requires userspace to opt-in to exposing Hyper-V.
> >
> >> > documented in the HyperV TLFS,
> >
> > s/TLFS/spec? Readers that aren't already familiar with Hyper-V will have no idea
> > what TLFS is until they click the link.
> >
> >> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs,
> >> > which consists of a subset of paravirtualized interfaces that HyperV exposes
> >
> > We can trim this paragraph by stating that KVM only supports a subset of the
> > PV interfaces straightaway.
> >
> >> > to its guests.
> >
> > E.g.
> >
> > Provides KVM support for for emulating Microsoft Hyper-V. This allows KVM to
> > expose a subset of the paravirtualized interfaces defined in Hyper-V's spec:
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs.
To fold in the whole "Microsoft Hypervisor" thing, what if we take the verbiage
verbatim from the TLFS intro?
Provides KVM support for emulating Microsoft Hyper-V. This allows KVM to
expose a subset of the paravirtualized interfaces defined in the Hyper-V
Hypervisor Top-Level Functional Specification (TLFS):
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs
> LGTM, thanks!
>
> >
> >> >
> >> > This improves performance of modern Windows guests.
> >
> > Isn't Hyper-V emulation effectively mandatory these days? IIRC, modern versions
> > of Windows will fail to boot if they detect a hypervisor but the core Hyper-V
> > interfaces aren't supported.
> >
>
> It's rather a rule of thumb: normally, modern Windows and Hyper-V
> versions (Win10/11, WS2019/22) boot and pretend to work but without
> Hyper-V enlightenment it's not uncommon to see a blue screen of death
> because of a watchdog firing. It's hard to say for sure as things keep
> changing under the hood so even different builds can behave differently;
> pretending we're a genuine Hyper-V was proven to be the most robust
> approach.
We should capture something to that effect in the help. I want to avoid bug
reports of Windows not working on KVM because someone turned off CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV
because the help implies that it _only_ improves performance.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-10 16:02 [PATCH RFC 00/11] KVM: x86: Make Hyper-V emulation optional (AKA introduce CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV) Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] KVM: x86: xen: Remove unneeded xen context from struct kvm_arch when !CONFIG_KVM_XEN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Move Hyper-V partition assist page out of Hyper-V emulation context Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-16 12:45 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] KVM: VMX: Split off vmx_onhyperv.{ch} from hyperv.{ch} Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Introduce kvm_hv_synic_auto_eoi_set() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Introduce kvm_hv_synic_has_vector() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] KVM: VMX: Split off hyperv_evmcs.{ch} Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-16 12:47 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] KVM: x86: Make Hyper-V emulation optional Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:49 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-16 12:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-16 15:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-16 15:43 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-16 16:45 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] KVM: nVMX: hyper-v: Introduce nested_vmx_evmptr() accessor Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:50 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-16 13:49 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-16 16:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] KVM: nVMX: hyper-v: Introduce nested_vmx_evmcs() accessor Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-10 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] KVM: nVMX: hyper-v: Hide more stuff under CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-10 16:03 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] KVM: nSVM: hyper-v: Hide more stuff under CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV/CONFIG_HYPERV Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-10-12 19:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZS1os-rIcdVu91Co@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox