linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: describe two-step feature handshake
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:58:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSPczSndiAlZfDOU@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009084247.GI3303@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3317 bytes --]

Hi Mike,

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 11:42:47AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:02:01PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> > Fully describe how UFFDIO_API can be used to perform a two-step feature
> > handshake, and also note the case where this isn't necessary (programs
> > which don't depend on any extra features).
> > 
> > This lets us clean up an old FIXME asking for this to be described.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>

Since v2 is unchanged, I've added this tag.  Thanks for the review!

Cheers,
Alex

> 
> > ---
> >  man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> > index 339adf8fe..e91a1dfc8 100644
> > --- a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> > +++ b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> > @@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ struct uffdio_api {
> >  The
> >  .I api
> >  field denotes the API version requested by the application.
> > -.PP
> >  The kernel verifies that it can support the requested API version,
> >  and sets the
> >  .I features
> > @@ -93,6 +92,25 @@ fields to bit masks representing all the available features and the generic
> >  .BR ioctl (2)
> >  operations available.
> >  .PP
> > +After Linux 4.11,
> > +applications should use the
> > +.I features
> > +field to perform a two-step handshake.
> > +First,
> > +.BR UFFDIO_API
> > +is called with the
> > +.I features
> > +field set to zero.
> > +The kernel responsds by setting all supported feature bits.

s/responsds/responds/ amended.

> > +.PP
> > +Applications which do not require any specific features
> > +can begin using the userfaultfd immediately.
> > +Applications which do need specific features
> > +should call
> > +.BR UFFDIO_API
> > +again with a subset of the reported feature bits set
> > +to enable those features.
> > +.PP
> >  Before Linux 4.11, the
> >  .I features
> >  field must be initialized to zero before the call to
> > @@ -102,24 +120,11 @@ and zero (i.e., no feature bits) is placed in the
> >  field by the kernel upon return from
> >  .BR ioctl (2).
> >  .PP
> > -Starting from Linux 4.11, the
> > -.I features
> > -field can be used to ask whether particular features are supported
> > -and explicitly enable userfaultfd features that are disabled by default.
> > -The kernel always reports all the available features in the
> > -.I features
> > -field.
> > -.PP
> > -To enable userfaultfd features the application should set
> > -a bit corresponding to each feature it wants to enable in the
> > -.I features
> > -field.
> > -If the kernel supports all the requested features it will enable them.
> > -Otherwise it will zero out the returned
> > +If the application sets unsupported feature bits,
> > +the kernel will zero out the returned
> >  .I uffdio_api
> >  structure and return
> >  .BR EINVAL .
> > -.\" FIXME add more details about feature negotiation and enablement
> >  .PP
> >  The following feature bits may be set:
> >  .TP
> > -- 
> > 2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-19 19:01 [PATCH 00/10] userfaultfd man page updates Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 01/10] userfaultfd.2: briefly mention two-step feature handshake process Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:26   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:38   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 02/10] userfaultfd.2: reword to account for new fault resolution ioctls Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:29   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:39   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 03/10] userfaultfd.2: comment on feature detection in the example program Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:32   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:40   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: fix a few trivial mistakes Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:37   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: describe two-step feature handshake Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:44   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:42   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 10:58     ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: describe missing UFFDIO_API feature flags Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:50   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:45   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 10:49     ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: correct and update UFFDIO_API ioctl error codes Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:52   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:49     ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 11:01       ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: clarify the state of the uffdio_api structure on error Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:56   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-26 17:58     ` Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-09  9:03   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: fix / update UFFDIO_REGISTER error code list Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: document new UFFDIO_POISON ioctl Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-09  9:09   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-10 17:13     ` Axel Rasmussen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZSPczSndiAlZfDOU@debian \
    --to=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).