Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: add module parameter to not run block kworker on isolated CPUs

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

(cc'ing Frederic)

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:22:16PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Kernel parameter of `isolcpus=` is used for isolating CPUs for specific
> task, and user often won't want block IO to disturb these CPUs, also long
> IO latency may be caused if blk-mq kworker is scheduled on these isolated
> CPUs.
> 
> Kernel workqueue only respects this limit for WQ_UNBOUND, for bound wq,
> the responsibility should be on wq user.
> 
> Add one block layer parameter for not running block kworker on isolated
> CPUs.
> 
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Theurer <atheurer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sebastian Jug <sejug@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index ec922c6bccbe..c53b5b522053 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include <linux/prefetch.h>
>  #include <linux/blk-crypto.h>
>  #include <linux/part_stat.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
>  
>  #include <trace/events/block.h>
>  
> @@ -42,6 +43,13 @@
>  #include "blk-rq-qos.h"
>  #include "blk-ioprio.h"
>  
> +static bool respect_cpu_isolation;
> +module_param(respect_cpu_isolation, bool, 0444);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(respect_cpu_isolation,
> +		"Don't schedule blk-mq worker on isolated CPUs passed in "
> +		"isolcpus= or nohz_full=. User need to guarantee to not run "
> +		"block IO on isolated CPUs (default: false)");

Any chance we can centralize these? It's no fun to try to hunt down module
params to opt in different subsystems and the housekeeping interface does
have some provisions for selecting different parts. I'd much prefer to see
these settings to be collected into a central place.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun