public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	rene@exactcode.de, x86@kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Fix the AMD Fam 17h, Fam 19h, Zen2 and Zen4 enumerations
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 20:12:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSg28on6W4YB47y+@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012074051.GBZSejA6bTV53638DE@fat_crate.local>


* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:28:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > While in reality:
> > 
> >    Zen 2 == Fam 17h
> >    Zen 4 == Fam 19h
> 
> If only were that easy...
> 
> family 0x17 is Zen1 and 2, family 0x19 is spread around Zen 3 and 4.
>
...
> See above. The MSRs are per Zen generation while the family is per
> family. Yes, it is confusing. :-\

Fun!
 
> IOW, you want to have this as the end product:
> 
> /* Zen4 */
> #define MSR_ZEN4_BP_CFG                 0xc001102e
> #define MSR_ZEN4_BP_CFG_SHARED_BTB_FIX_BIT 5
> 
> /* Fam 19h MSRs */
> #define MSR_F19H_UMC_PERF_CTL           0xc0010800
> #define MSR_F19H_UMC_PERF_CTR           0xc0010801
> 
> /* Zen 2 */
> #define MSR_ZEN2_SPECTRAL_CHICKEN       0xc00110e3
> #define MSR_ZEN2_SPECTRAL_CHICKEN_BIT   BIT_ULL(1)
> 
> /* Fam 17h MSRs */
> #define MSR_F17H_IRPERF			0xc00000e9

Ok, thanks - I've distilled your enumeration order into the separate
patch below - there's more commits in perf/core meanwhile, and maybe
it isn't even bad there's a bit of a spotlight on the naming
scheme here.

I've turned your above grouping & comments into a patch, created a 
changelog and added your SOB, see the perf/core commit below.
Lemme know if that's not OK to you.

Thanks,

	Ingo

=============>
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 20:01:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Fix the AMD Fam 17h, Fam 19h, Zen2 and Zen4 MSR enumerations

The comments introduced in <asm/msr-index.h> in the merge conflict fixup in:

  8f4156d58713 ("Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into perf/core, to resolve conflict")

... aren't right: AMD naming schemes are more complex than implied,
family 0x17 is Zen1 and 2, family 0x19 is spread around Zen 3 and 4.

So there's indeed four separate MSR namespaces for:

  MSR_F17H_
  MSR_F19H_
  MSR_ZEN2_
  MSR_ZEN4_

... and the namespaces cannot be merged.

Fix it up. No change in functionality.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/D99589F4-BC5D-430B-87B2-72C20370CF57@exactcode.com
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index 0ad9ba8baa8a..f8b502867dd1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -637,18 +637,20 @@
 /* AMD Last Branch Record MSRs */
 #define MSR_AMD64_LBR_SELECT			0xc000010e
 
-/* Fam 19h (Zen 4) MSRs */
-#define MSR_F19H_UMC_PERF_CTL		0xc0010800
-#define MSR_F19H_UMC_PERF_CTR		0xc0010801
-
-#define MSR_ZEN4_BP_CFG			0xc001102e
+/* Zen4 */
+#define MSR_ZEN4_BP_CFG                 0xc001102e
 #define MSR_ZEN4_BP_CFG_SHARED_BTB_FIX_BIT 5
 
-/* Fam 17h (Zen 2) MSRs */
-#define MSR_F17H_IRPERF			0xc00000e9
+/* Fam 19h MSRs */
+#define MSR_F19H_UMC_PERF_CTL           0xc0010800
+#define MSR_F19H_UMC_PERF_CTR           0xc0010801
 
-#define MSR_ZEN2_SPECTRAL_CHICKEN	0xc00110e3
-#define MSR_ZEN2_SPECTRAL_CHICKEN_BIT	BIT_ULL(1)
+/* Zen 2 */
+#define MSR_ZEN2_SPECTRAL_CHICKEN       0xc00110e3
+#define MSR_ZEN2_SPECTRAL_CHICKEN_BIT   BIT_ULL(1)
+
+/* Fam 17h MSRs */
+#define MSR_F17H_IRPERF			0xc00000e9
 
 /* Fam 16h MSRs */
 #define MSR_F16H_L2I_PERF_CTL		0xc0010230

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-12 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 15:29 [RFC] AMD Zen4 CPU bug? Spurious SMT Sibling Invalid Opcode Speculation René Rebe
2023-10-04 22:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-06  9:21   ` René Rebe
2023-10-06  9:32     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-10  8:39       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-10 21:18         ` René Rebe
2023-10-11  8:59           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-11  9:23 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/cpu: Fix AMD erratum #1485 on Zen4-based CPUs tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov (AMD)
2023-10-11 21:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-12  7:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-12 18:12       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-10-12 18:20 ` [tip: perf/core] x86/cpu: Fix the AMD Fam 17h, Fam 19h, Zen2 and Zen4 MSR enumerations tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZSg28on6W4YB47y+@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rene@exactcode.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox