* [PATCH 6.1 6/6] lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages()
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, Andrew Donnellan,
Alexander Potapenko, Xiaoke Wang, Andrew Morton
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit efb78fa86e95 ("lib/test_meminit: allocate pages up to order
MAX_ORDER") works great in kernels 6.4 and newer thanks to commit
23baf831a32c ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely"), but for older
kernels, the loop is off by one, which causes crashes when the test
runs.
Fix this up by changing "<= MAX_ORDER" "< MAX_ORDER" to allow the test
to work properly for older kernel branches.
Fixes: 421855d0d24d ("lib/test_meminit: allocate pages up to order MAX_ORDER")
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
lib/test_meminit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/lib/test_meminit.c
+++ b/lib/test_meminit.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int __init test_pages(int *total_
int failures = 0, num_tests = 0;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i <= MAX_ORDER; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_ORDER; i++)
num_tests += do_alloc_pages_order(i, &failures);
REPORT_FAILURES_IN_FN();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 6/6] lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages() Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-10-12 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-10-12 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor
On 10/12/23 11:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 6/6] lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-10-12 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
2023-10-13 2:33 ` Guenter Roeck
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-10-12 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 781 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-10-12 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-10-13 2:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-10-13 5:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-10-13 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 529 pass: 529 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-10-13 2:33 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-10-13 5:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-10-13 12:15 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-10-13 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 557 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully compiled and installed bindeb-pkgs on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-10-13 5:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-10-13 12:15 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2023-10-13 13:10 ` Ron Economos
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2023-10-13 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
Hi Greg
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 3:01 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
6.1.58-rc1 tested.
Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)
Thanks
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-10-13 12:15 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2023-10-13 13:10 ` Ron Economos
2023-10-13 13:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
2023-10-13 16:53 ` Naresh Kamboju
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-10-13 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
On 10/12/23 11:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-10-13 13:10 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-10-13 13:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
2023-10-13 16:53 ` Naresh Kamboju
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo B. Marliere @ 2023-10-13 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
On 23/10/12 08:00PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No build errors, dmesg is clean. My system runs fine:
Linux version 6.1.58-rc1+ (rbmarliere@debian) (Debian clang version 16.0.6 (15), GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.41) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Oct 13 10:03:55 -03 2023
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core Processor
Tested-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-10-13 13:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
@ 2023-10-13 16:53 ` Naresh Kamboju
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-10-13 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, LTP List
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 23:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTE:
Following LTP dio and hugetlb test cases are back to PASS status.
Fixes compared with last release.
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
- dio01
- dio02
- dio03
- dio05
- dio06
- dio07
- dio08
- dio09
- dio11
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
- hugemmap11
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.58-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 3fe61dd155ac48d1642f5cac17bd41a92ef585b7
* git describe: v6.1.57-7-g3fe61dd155ac
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.57-7-g3fe61dd155ac
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.57)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.57)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.57)
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
- dio01
- dio02
- dio03
- dio05
- dio06
- dio07
- dio08
- dio09
- dio11
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
- hugemmap11
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.57)
## Test result summary
total: 114725, pass: 97010, fail: 2320, skip: 15240, xfail: 155
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 149 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 53 total, 52 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 41 total, 39 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 29 total, 27 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 15 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 10 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* v4l2-complianciance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread