From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"moderated list:XEN HYPERVISOR INTERFACE"
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen-pciback: Consider INTx disabled when MSI/MSI-X is enabled
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:05:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSz8xu8E9-02Ej8D@macbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221118154931.1928298-1-marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:49:23PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Linux enables MSI-X before disabling INTx, but keeps MSI-X masked until
> the table is filled. Then it disables INTx just before clearing MASKALL
> bit. Currently this approach is rejected by xen-pciback.
> According to the PCIe spec, device cannot use INTx when MSI/MSI-X is
> enabled (in other words: enabling MSI/MSI-X implicitly disables INTx).
>
> Change the logic to consider INTx disabled if MSI/MSI-X is enabled. This
> applies to three places:
> - checking currently enabled interrupts type,
> - transition to MSI/MSI-X - where INTx would be implicitly disabled,
> - clearing INTx disable bit - which can be allowed even if MSI/MSI-X is
> enabled, as device should consider INTx disabled anyway in that case
Is this last point strictly needed? From the description above it
seems Linux only cares about enabling MSI(-X) without the disable INTx
bit set.
>
> Fixes: 5e29500eba2a ("xen-pciback: Allow setting PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL too")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - allow clearing INTx regardless of MSI/MSI-X state, to be consistent
> with enabling MSI/MSI-X
> Changes in v2:
> - restructure the patch to consider not only MASKALL bit, but enabling
> MSI/MSI-X generally, without explicitly disabling INTx first
> ---
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c | 19 +++++++++++------
> .../xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c | 21 +++----------------
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
> index 059de92aea7d..d47eee6c5143 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
> @@ -288,12 +288,6 @@ int xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type(struct pci_dev *dev)
> u16 val;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - err = pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - if (!(val & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE))
> - ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_INTX;
> -
> /*
> * Do not trust dev->msi(x)_enabled here, as enabling could be done
> * bypassing the pci_*msi* functions, by the qemu.
> @@ -316,6 +310,19 @@ int xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (val & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE)
> ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_MSIX;
> }
Since we are explicitly hiding INTx now, should we also do something
about MSI(X) being both enabled at the same time? The spec states:
"System configuration software sets one of these bits to enable either
MSI or MSI-X, but never both simultaneously. Behavior is undefined if
both MSI and MSI-X are enabled simultaneously."
So finding both MSI and MSI-X enabled likely means something has gone
very wrong? Likely to be done in a separate change, just realized
while looking at the patch context.
> +
> + /*
> + * PCIe spec says device cannot use INTx if MSI/MSI-X is enabled,
> + * so check for INTx only when both are disabled.
> + */
> + if (!ret) {
> + err = pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + if (!(val & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE))
> + ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_INTX;
> + }
> +
> return ret ?: INTERRUPT_TYPE_NONE;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c
> index 097316a74126..eb4c1af44f5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c
> @@ -236,10 +236,11 @@ static int msi_msix_flags_write(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset, u16 new_value,
> return PCIBIOS_SET_FAILED;
>
> if (new_value & field_config->enable_bit) {
> - /* don't allow enabling together with other interrupt types */
> + /* don't allow enabling together with other interrupt type */
This comment needs to be adjusted to note that we allow enabling while
INTx is not disabled in the command register, in order to please
Linuxes MSI(-X) startup sequence.
FWIW, another option would be to simply disable INTX here once MSI(-X)
is attempted to be enabled, won't that avoid having to modify
xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type()?
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 15:49 [PATCH v3] xen-pciback: Consider INTx disabled when MSI/MSI-X is enabled Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-18 20:46 ` Jason Andryuk
2022-11-18 21:46 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-19 14:36 ` Jason Andryuk
2022-11-19 16:33 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-21 15:41 ` Jason Andryuk
2022-11-21 16:16 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-28 13:44 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-30 19:40 ` Jason Andryuk
2023-09-27 10:33 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2023-10-16 6:16 ` Juergen Gross
2023-10-16 9:05 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2023-10-16 13:04 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2023-10-16 13:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSz8xu8E9-02Ej8D@macbook \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox