From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: takeru hayasaka <hayatake396@gmail.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP from ethtool
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:57:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTAceqxFSmL-jFuw@nataraja> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018103703.41fd4d9b@kernel.org>
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:37:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Harald went further and questioned use of the same IP addresses for
> -U and -C traffic, but even within one endpoint aren't these running
> on a different port?
yes.
> Can someone reasonably use the same UDP port for both types of traffic?
I don't think so. In the entire 3GPP protocol world, the UDP port numbers
for GTP-U and GTP-C are fixed. The various signaling protocols allow you to
communicate the IPv4/v6 address and TEID of tunnel endpoints, but never allow
you to communicate the port number - which hence must always be the well-known port
(2123 for GTP-C + 2152 for GTP-U).
Of course somebody could do whatever they want in some kind of internal interface
not required to interoperate with any other equipment/implementation/operator, but
I'd consider it not falling in your question of "reasonable use".
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> https://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 6:01 [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP from ethtool Takeru Hayasaka
2023-10-16 9:27 ` Simon Horman
2023-10-16 22:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-17 6:11 ` Harald Welte
2023-10-17 6:44 ` Harald Welte
2023-10-17 14:18 ` takeru hayasaka
2023-10-17 14:37 ` takeru hayasaka
2023-10-17 16:49 ` takeru hayasaka
2023-10-18 8:25 ` Harald Welte
2023-10-18 16:20 ` takeru hayasaka
2023-10-17 23:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 1:53 ` takeru hayasaka
2023-10-18 8:12 ` Harald Welte
2023-10-18 17:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 17:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 17:57 ` Harald Welte [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTAceqxFSmL-jFuw@nataraja \
--to=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hayatake396@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox