From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"jianyong.wu@arm.com" <jianyong.wu@arm.com>,
"justin.he@arm.com" <justin.he@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Rename acpi_scan_device_not_present() to be about enumeration
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:28:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTeqeRRbJgEdbMV3@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5589E5A5-9F97-416A-9C48-9828B0BE58CD@oracle.com>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:15:07AM +0000, Miguel Luis wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> > On 20 Oct 2023, at 18:47, Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> >
> > acpi_scan_device_not_present() is called when a device in the
> > hierarchy is not available for enumeration. Historically enumeration
> > was only based on whether the device was present.
> >
> > To add support for only enumerating devices that are both present
> > and enabled, this helper should be renamed. It was only ever about
> > enumeration, rename it acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated().
> >
> > No change in behaviour is intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>
> Fixes: 443fc8202272 ("ACPI / hotplug: Rework generic code to handle suprise removals”) ?
I'm not sure a patch that is merely renaming a function should ever
have a Fixes tag, since it's just a naming issue, it doesn't fix a
bug, change functionality or anything like that.
I would suggest that there would need to be good reason why such a
patch should be backported to stable kernels - for example, something
else that does fix a user visible bug requires this change.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 18:47 [PATCH] ACPI: Rename acpi_scan_device_not_present() to be about enumeration Russell King
2023-10-24 10:15 ` Miguel Luis
2023-10-24 11:28 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-10-24 11:38 ` Miguel Luis
2023-10-24 12:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTeqeRRbJgEdbMV3@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox