From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, "Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce UTIL_FITS_CAPACITY feature (v2)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:34:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTjE6ofbjhsMcLVP@chenyu5-mobl2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14ab201e-0170-4dd7-a1ec-7587fe27385a@arm.com>
On 2023-10-24 at 17:03:25 +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 24/10/2023 08:10, Chen Yu wrote:
> > On 2023-10-23 at 11:04:49 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> On 2023-10-23 10:11, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >>> On 19/10/2023 18:05, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> Or like find_energy_efficient_cpu() (feec(), used in
> >>> Energy-Aware-Scheduling (EAS)) which uses cpu_util(cpu, p, cpu, 0) to get:
> >>>
> >>> max(util_avg(CPU + p), util_est(CPU + p))
> >>
> >> I've tried using cpu_util(), but unfortunately anything that considers
> >> blocked/sleeping tasks in its utilization total does not work for my
> >> use-case.
> >>
> >> From cpu_util():
> >>
> >> * CPU utilization is the sum of running time of runnable tasks plus the
> >> * recent utilization of currently non-runnable tasks on that CPU.
> >>
> >
> > I thought cpu_util() indicates the utilization decay sum of task that was once
> > "running" on this CPU, but will not sum up the "util/load" of the blocked/sleeping
> > task?
>
> cpu_util() here refers to:
>
> cpu_util(int cpu, struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, int boost)
>
> which when called with (cpu, p, cpu, 0) and task_cpu(p) != cpu returns:
>
> max(util_avg(CPU + p), util_est(CPU + p))
>
> The term `CPU utilization` in cpu_util()'s header stands for
> cfs_rq->avg.util_avg.
>
> It does not sum up the utilization of blocked tasks but it can contain
> it. They have to be a blocked tasks and not tasks which were running in
> cfs_rq since we subtract utilization of tasks which are migrating away
> from the cfs_rq (cfs_rq->removed.util_avg in remove_entity_load_avg()
> and update_cfs_rq_load_avg()).
Thanks for this description in detail, Dietmar. Yes, I just realized that,
if the blocked tasks once ran on this cfs_rq and not being migrated away,
the cfs_rq's util_avg will contain those utils.
thanks,
Chenyu
> > accumulate_sum()
> > /* only the running task's util will be sum up */
> > if (running)
> > sa->util_sum += contrib << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
> >
> > WRITE_ONCE(sa->util_avg, sa->util_sum / divider);
>
> __update_load_avg_cfs_rq()
>
> ___update_load_sum(..., cfs_rq->curr != NULL
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> running
> accumulate_sum()
>
> if (periods)
> /* decay _sum */
> sa->util_sum = decay_load(sa->util_sum, ...)
>
> if (load)
> /* decay and accrue _sum */
> contrib = __accumulate_pelt_segments(...)
>
> When crossing periods we decay the old _sum and when additionally load
> != 0 we decay and accrue the new _sum as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 16:05 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair migration reduction features Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-19 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce UTIL_FITS_CAPACITY feature (v2) Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-23 14:11 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-10-23 15:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-24 6:10 ` Chen Yu
2023-10-24 14:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-25 7:19 ` Chen Yu
2023-10-24 15:03 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-10-25 7:34 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2023-10-24 14:10 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-10-25 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-25 14:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-19 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: Introduce SELECT_BIAS_PREV to reduce migrations Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-27 3:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair migration reduction features K Prateek Nayak
2023-11-06 5:52 ` Chen Yu
2023-11-06 7:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-11-06 17:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-11-07 3:02 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-11-06 16:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-11-09 14:58 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTjE6ofbjhsMcLVP@chenyu5-mobl2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox