public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>, Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] riscv: Checksum header
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 23:22:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUJtTEeFD24ZYXHQ@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031-optimize_checksum-v9-3-ea018e69b229@rivosinc.com>

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 05:18:53PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
> instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
> register to avoid some overflow checking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3d77cac338fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Checksum routines
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +
> +#include <linux/in6.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
> +
> +/* Define riscv versions of functions before importing asm-generic/checksum.h */
> +#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers will
> + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal to 5.
> + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned given that NET_IP_ALIGN is set to 2 on
> + *	riscv, defining IP headers to be aligned.
> + */
> +static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> +{
> +	unsigned long csum = 0;
> +	int pos = 0;
> +
> +	do {
> +		csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> +			csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> +	} while (++pos < ihl);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
> +	 * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> +	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> +		unsigned long fold_temp;
> +
> +		asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
> +					      RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)

This looks like a open coding of riscv_has_extension_*, so if
we use the it, the code could be rewritten as:

	if (riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB)) {
		if (32bit) {
			asm(...)

		} else {
			asm(...)
		}
		return csum >> 16;
	}
#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
	csum += ror64(csum, 32);
	csum >>= 32;
#endif
	return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);

The code readability is improved and make it a bit easier to refactor
the asm(...) code in the future.

And IMHO, the generated code should be the same.

Thanks

>

> +		    :
> +		    :
> +		    :
> +		    : no_zbb);
> +
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> +			asm(".option push				\n\
> +			.option arch,+zbb				\n\
> +				not	%[fold_temp], %[csum]		\n\
> +				rori	%[csum], %[csum], 16		\n\
> +				sub	%[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]	\n\
> +			.option pop"
> +			: [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> +		} else {
> +			asm(".option push				\n\
> +			.option arch,+zbb				\n\
> +				rori	%[fold_temp], %[csum], 32	\n\
> +				add	%[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]	\n\
> +				srli	%[csum], %[csum], 32		\n\
> +				not	%[fold_temp], %[csum]		\n\
> +				roriw	%[csum], %[csum], 16		\n\
> +				subw	%[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]	\n\
> +			.option pop"
> +			: [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> +		}
> +		return csum >> 16;
> +	}
> +no_zbb:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
> +	csum += ror64(csum, 32);
> +	csum >>= 32;
> +#endif
> +	return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H */
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-01 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-01  0:18 [PATCH v9 0/5] riscv: Add fine-tuned checksum functions Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01  0:18 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] asm-generic: Improve csum_fold Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01  0:18 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] riscv: Add static key for misaligned accesses Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01  0:18 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] riscv: Checksum header Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01 15:22   ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2023-11-01 17:07     ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01  0:18 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] riscv: Add checksum library Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01  0:18 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] riscv: Test checksum functions Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01 19:14   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-01 20:12     ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-01 11:50 ` [PATCH v9 0/5] riscv: Add fine-tuned " Conor Dooley
2023-11-01 17:06   ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-11-02 10:21     ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZUJtTEeFD24ZYXHQ@xhacker \
    --to=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox