From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E13C4332F for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 19:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232755AbjKFTuo (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:50:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49460 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232686AbjKFTul (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:50:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x649.google.com (mail-pl1-x649.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::649]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B6CD69 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:50:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x649.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1cc2be064b8so32219595ad.1 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 11:50:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1699300238; x=1699905038; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0wGNMs0oca0tadm30CfndT39i7CYhn3JaOLDgl0WWCo=; b=nznY5cUaK3YO/LDtRTDeCM4++MJJJLahvX+4ZX3Xil4ytS4BXlHvXR+yt9zqaugOWe o5QsZZZ4cldqjfOx4HX1QoIhJa+DkdQRaTULC6i2fLmhe9gTJBhyqjt8w2ZmpVO4c93J WKZrufd/AAGUiWaku4J8m1Jb7oyp540Ir6d5kYFV7a08g+xaM4mshGzV01hKOq1XM4NJ z99VUa/n1d944HT8PzuIl5TI5ABIPk/VQrAZFwC3D3db1pjHx8G1IvWx+KuUMKkGOUh0 PJ3Wf8AYXbxFwedGQZs7LytTabfj2azT5xB5JTHHfVWKXoI5RhNQkPSCT2oWI0iJkGkW CpuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699300238; x=1699905038; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0wGNMs0oca0tadm30CfndT39i7CYhn3JaOLDgl0WWCo=; b=iGk9clopRqiMd2QjGbXQXxzAjwKZD8AFKfZKiuGPO2XSwX7lmV33YDWmENvbLBCScC fHPU0oaVAnHUgfLNwDTE0rNd279bv53GXI04gRLUFvb3QVoQcrTdoMUO7Jn9bnjlbKqu m6zaX2SSyt9vhqyHNjxQBv0Te+W3J5xiQ0dgbykcvIHXBfnMq8WtRSj1KuSKZbQ4RUk/ c0/Bk6GWcAiPFkYbuVy5PZRBnUegmBsws6+n5F9oOCCfPoVMrBzhNiGCTKam+CmP70ed NIub93mNTynNsZlziV+0x6sphqfqWSDuBwOdPAS+YEVZn65xw+ewC4/zLkLBzd6sxSkl yX1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyhameohEEIso/LjSieToUyPCQtJk6u7JaiTh8ofMDVtCjAFTwt PyY2d8uBM1ssdFW7HJ6BChNEeFSSILU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFzKia81UldM1nmPaylTTUDc2KKAjSeNKt0eO7uRRZeqHXqZvnJgK+QHuithDc6gGaD4UvO9kB48y0= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:bd85:b0:1c9:bdc5:c34a with SMTP id q5-20020a170902bd8500b001c9bdc5c34amr14265pls.0.1699300238578; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 11:50:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:50:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20231104000239.367005-1-seanjc@google.com> <20231104000239.367005-9-seanjc@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/20] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters From: Sean Christopherson To: Jim Mattson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kan Liang , Dapeng Mi , Jinrong Liang , Like Xu , Aaron Lewis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 04, 2023, Jim Mattson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 5:02=E2=80=AFPM Sean Christopherson wrote: > > +#define KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(__reg, __bit) = \ > > +({ = \ > > + struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature =3D { = \ > > + .f =3D KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE(0xa, 0, __reg, __bit), = \ > > + }; = \ > > + = \ > > + kvm_static_assert(KVM_CPUID_##__reg =3D=3D KVM_CPUID_EBX || = \ > > + KVM_CPUID_##__reg =3D=3D KVM_CPUID_ECX); = \ > > + feature; = \ > > }) > > > > -#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(5) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX= , 0) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX= , 1) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_CYCLES KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX= , 2) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_REFERENCES KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX= , 3) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_MISSES KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX= , 4) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX= , 5) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX= , 6) >=20 > Why not add top down slots now? Laziness? =20 > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED_FIXED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(ECX= , 0) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES_FIXED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(ECX= , 1) > > +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_CYCLES_FIXED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(ECX= , 2) >=20 > Perhaps toss 'TSC' between CYCLES and FIXED? I think X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_TSC_CYCLES_FIXED is more aligned with how= the SDM (and English in general) talks about reference cycles. > And add top down slots now> Ya.