From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BB6C4332F for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233797AbjKGJJ3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2023 04:09:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34664 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233844AbjKGJI5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2023 04:08:57 -0500 Received: from nautica.notk.org (nautica.notk.org [91.121.71.147]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC0510D3; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 01:08:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id DB844C01C; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 10:08:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1699348112; bh=p1hhTlkHRNBwSalgO0gLVkqAEwk8nZAf/XeSXUwldc4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YkpmTlyydJsYin0D/3qcpmebBI8LuSeqZoqDOqEwCN2Yr7gfjjWsu/OU9ADQqpx4Y q5ZzBmnZALYGfKQcOEMa5s2+IQt/FjgLA1iOEU4HyTF3rS7tqEdwL8TgmQze0OOGLn hGdUZx5KsL64DZoqQUOCqdQiA0oU7b0XE+w9o3refghJkiqKM2XMjKfPsXJB2e1mTP ddTeofP0fOc1qHAcuMlKMOfVE2jiU2/GpfQVR4MTX24Ro06N0AMMTOiDhJT3HYNyUc /seudTX1Rc2q4lcAtrgC28pS6pu8QN3yPwB0SHEh9RtCCeNXg1ezlxET08qnDDMAI4 r+sjyLMXqE2aQ== Received: from gaia (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42C7C009; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 10:08:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1699348110; bh=p1hhTlkHRNBwSalgO0gLVkqAEwk8nZAf/XeSXUwldc4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=H7w52jMqsQ1Gb6vTLqkBSTcJA9YesVDgf6iZYUj8JCd843h1mAd8YAw01jF4Ez5bR 0U5oPwYahyMn/82rK7oTSIXYdqASB05N1L3W0sZD+s6ESCPwvWunuuKB1jiziYKjGy bjdE2yR/cybHUasnrdxrWJGEb1NjCqQE4oZQWqxODMriWHcYQv6CjBy1KRjXfMiz8f +aglC5EAZzJl/d8uXfVLJWb7u1zwZhX8CRhimFa/3W+Yw85BMbj3VP2LmlUQGxhJav gt6aBGKnuT+UZ3E9Nk2dz7XY0b7mK2DcNIMFEIoe0xLs/BrjzkHWAIzhokJaCEci/o DNUPPrUdMIukA== Received: from localhost (gaia [local]) by gaia (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 25f2b5b1; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 18:08:07 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20231106130304.678610325@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231106130304.678610325@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 02:03:28PM +0100: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release. > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Tested on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet By the way, I wanted to start semi-automatize this (for 5.10 specifically since that's the kernel we're based on) and started watching the linux-stable-rc.git's linux-5.10.y branch, specifically the rev in this command: git ls-remote git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git refs/heads/linux-5.10.y And there were two different "Linux 5.10.200-rc1" commits on the 1st, 3rd before the final rev on the 6th (this mail) as I assume you were preparing this branch (and it's perfectly fine!) Is there anything appropriate to watch instead, or should I setup mail filters to see the announce mail instead of trying to second-guess the git repo? While I'm asking questions, I'm also comparing the dmesg output from one version to the next by hand (as ordering etc changes a bit from one run to the next it's a bit hard to automate reliably), if you're aware of a fuzzy-diff for dmesg outputs or should I just kludge that in a corner? (Should have noticed the MMC quirk regression[1] in 5.10.199 if I had been doing that properly last time... It's too easy to miss when a line just disappears and there's no error [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231103004220.1666641-1-asmadeus@codewreck.org/ (not yet in master)) -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus