* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-11-06 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-11-07 20:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 17:53 ` Daniel Díaz
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-11-06 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor
On 11/6/23 05:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
perf fails to build with:
util/evlist.c: In function 'evlist__add_aux_dummy':
util/evlist.c:269:31: warning: implicit declaration of function
'evlist__dummy_event'; did you mean 'evsel__is_dummy_event'?
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
269 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| evsel__is_dummy_event
util/evlist.c:269:31: warning: initialization of 'struct evsel *' from
'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
...
LINK
/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/perf
/local/stbopt_p/toolchains_303/stbgcc-12.3-0.2/bin/../lib/gcc/aarch64-unknown-linux-musl/12.3.0/../../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-musl/bin/ld:
/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/perf-in.o:
in function `evlist__add_aux_dummy':
/local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:269:
undefined reference to `evlist__dummy_event'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-11-07 20:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-11-07 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Fainelli
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 09:37:56AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/6/23 05:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> perf fails to build with:
>
> util/evlist.c: In function 'evlist__add_aux_dummy':
> util/evlist.c:269:31: warning: implicit declaration of function
> 'evlist__dummy_event'; did you mean 'evsel__is_dummy_event'?
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 269 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | evsel__is_dummy_event
> util/evlist.c:269:31: warning: initialization of 'struct evsel *' from 'int'
> makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>
> ...
>
> LINK /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/perf
> /local/stbopt_p/toolchains_303/stbgcc-12.3-0.2/bin/../lib/gcc/aarch64-unknown-linux-musl/12.3.0/../../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-musl/bin/ld: /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/perf-in.o:
> in function `evlist__add_aux_dummy':
> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm64/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:269:
> undefined reference to `evlist__dummy_event'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Will go fix that now, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-11-06 17:53 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-11-06 18:14 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-11-06 21:30 ` Pavel Machek
2023-11-06 21:50 ` Pavel Machek
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Díaz @ 2023-11-06 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
Hello!
On 06/11/23 7:03 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
There seems to be a problem building for RISC-V with GCC 8, 12, and Clang 17. This is with defconfig, allnoconfig, tinyconfig:
-----8<-----
/builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: In function 'riscv_intc_init':
/builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c:119:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'fwnode_dev_initialized'; did you mean 'zone_is_initialized'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
119 | fwnode_dev_initialized(of_fwnode_handle(node), true);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| zone_is_initialized
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:286: drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.o] Error 1
make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:503: drivers/irqchip] Error 2
make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1832: drivers] Error 2
make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
----->8-----
Currently bisecting.
Greetings!
Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 17:53 ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2023-11-06 18:14 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-11-07 20:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 21:30 ` Pavel Machek
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Díaz @ 2023-11-06 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, apatel
Hello!
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:53, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 06/11/23 7:03 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> There seems to be a problem building for RISC-V with GCC 8, 12, and Clang 17. This is with defconfig, allnoconfig, tinyconfig:
>
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: In function 'riscv_intc_init':
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c:119:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'fwnode_dev_initialized'; did you mean 'zone_is_initialized'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 119 | fwnode_dev_initialized(of_fwnode_handle(node), true);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | zone_is_initialized
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:286: drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:503: drivers/irqchip] Error 2
> make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1832: drivers] Error 2
> make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
> make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> ----->8-----
>
> Currently bisecting.
-----8<-----
Bisection done!
First commit presenting NEW behaviour: 6751b1fbf98ba2c40bbdda22e2e6714a9c27b91b
commit 6751b1fbf98ba2c40bbdda22e2e6714a9c27b91b
Author: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Tue Oct 3 10:13:51 2023 +0530
irqchip/riscv-intc: Mark all INTC nodes as initialized
[ Upstream commit e13cd66bd821be417c498a34928652db4ac6b436 ]
----->8-----
Reverting that commit makes the build happy again.
Greetings!
Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 18:14 ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2023-11-07 20:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-11-07 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Díaz
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, apatel
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:14:21PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:53, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 06/11/23 7:03 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> > > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > There seems to be a problem building for RISC-V with GCC 8, 12, and Clang 17. This is with defconfig, allnoconfig, tinyconfig:
> >
> > -----8<-----
> > /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: In function 'riscv_intc_init':
> > /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c:119:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'fwnode_dev_initialized'; did you mean 'zone_is_initialized'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 119 | fwnode_dev_initialized(of_fwnode_handle(node), true);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | zone_is_initialized
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:286: drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.o] Error 1
> > make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:503: drivers/irqchip] Error 2
> > make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1832: drivers] Error 2
> > make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> > make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
> > make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> > ----->8-----
> >
> > Currently bisecting.
>
> -----8<-----
> Bisection done!
> First commit presenting NEW behaviour: 6751b1fbf98ba2c40bbdda22e2e6714a9c27b91b
>
> commit 6751b1fbf98ba2c40bbdda22e2e6714a9c27b91b
> Author: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 3 10:13:51 2023 +0530
>
> irqchip/riscv-intc: Mark all INTC nodes as initialized
>
> [ Upstream commit e13cd66bd821be417c498a34928652db4ac6b436 ]
> ----->8-----
>
> Reverting that commit makes the build happy again.
Thanks, will go drop that now.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 17:53 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-11-06 18:14 ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2023-11-06 21:30 ` Pavel Machek
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-11-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Díaz
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2255 bytes --]
Hi!
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> There seems to be a problem building for RISC-V with GCC 8, 12, and Clang 17. This is with defconfig, allnoconfig, tinyconfig:
>
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: In function 'riscv_intc_init':
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c:119:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'fwnode_dev_initialized'; did you mean 'zone_is_initialized'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 119 | fwnode_dev_initialized(of_fwnode_handle(node), true);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | zone_is_initialized
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:286: drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:503: drivers/irqchip] Error 2
> make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1832: drivers] Error 2
> make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
> make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> ----->8-----
We see same problems in our risc-v build:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/5468492319
> Currently bisecting.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-11-06 17:53 ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2023-11-06 21:50 ` Pavel Machek
2023-11-07 11:34 ` Pavel Machek
2023-11-07 9:08 ` Dominique Martinet
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-11-06 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 602 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
There's something wrong here.
251e8b0a0 1aee91 o: 4.14| nfsd: lock_rename() needs both directories to live on the same fs
Is present in 4.14-stable but not 5.10-stable.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 21:50 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-11-07 11:34 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-11-07 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --]
Hi!
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> There's something wrong here.
>
> 251e8b0a0 1aee91 o: 4.14| nfsd: lock_rename() needs both directories to live on the same fs
>
> Is present in 4.14-stable but not 5.10-stable.
|22de5d11e 41bae5 o: 4.14| ASoC: simple-card: fixup asoc_simple_probe() error handling
This one is in 4.19 and 4.14-stable, but not in 5.10.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-06 21:50 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-11-07 9:08 ` Dominique Martinet
2023-11-07 11:43 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2023-11-07 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 02:03:28PM +0100:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
By the way, I wanted to start semi-automatize this (for 5.10
specifically since that's the kernel we're based on) and started
watching the linux-stable-rc.git's linux-5.10.y branch, specifically the
rev in this command:
git ls-remote git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git refs/heads/linux-5.10.y
And there were two different "Linux 5.10.200-rc1" commits on the 1st,
3rd before the final rev on the 6th (this mail) as I assume you were
preparing this branch (and it's perfectly fine!)
Is there anything appropriate to watch instead, or should I setup mail
filters to see the announce mail instead of trying to second-guess the
git repo?
While I'm asking questions, I'm also comparing the dmesg output from one
version to the next by hand (as ordering etc changes a bit from one run
to the next it's a bit hard to automate reliably), if you're aware of a
fuzzy-diff for dmesg outputs or should I just kludge that in a corner?
(Should have noticed the MMC quirk regression[1] in 5.10.199 if I had been
doing that properly last time... It's too easy to miss when a line just
disappears and there's no error
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231103004220.1666641-1-asmadeus@codewreck.org/
(not yet in master))
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 9:08 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2023-11-07 11:43 ` Jon Hunter
2023-11-07 15:40 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-11-07 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:03:28 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
68 tests: 68 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.200-rc1-gfed6441dbe52
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 11:43 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2023-11-07 15:40 ` Shuah Khan
2023-11-07 18:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-11-07 18:57 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-11-07 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, Shuah Khan
On 11/6/23 06:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 15:40 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-11-07 18:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-11-07 18:57 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-11-07 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 19:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
The riscv build regressions reported.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTE:
The riscv build failures already reported as others.
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.200-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: fed6441dbe524de2cf3a6a40d5d65c369bf583a0
* git describe: v5.10.199-96-gfed6441dbe52
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.199-96-gfed6441dbe52
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.199)
* riscv, build
- clang-17-allnoconfig
- clang-17-defconfig
- clang-17-tinyconfig
- gcc-12-allmodconfig
- gcc-12-allnoconfig
- gcc-12-defconfig
- gcc-12-tinyconfig
- gcc-8-allmodconfig
- gcc-8-allnoconfig
- gcc-8-defconfig
- gcc-8-tinyconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.199)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.199)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.199)
## Test result summary
total: 90579, pass: 71963, fail: 2500, skip: 16053, xfail: 63
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 116 total, 116 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 0 passed, 11 failed
* s390: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 18:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-11-07 18:57 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-11-07 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 02:03:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 149 fail: 10
Failed builds:
i386:tools/perf
x86_64:tools/perf
<all riscv32/riscv64>
Qemu test results:
total: 495 pass: 456 fail: 39
Failed tests:
<all riscv32/riscv64>
All failures have already been reported, so I wn't go into detail.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread