From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
To: Esker Wong <esker@chromium.org>
Cc: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Implement V4L2_EVENT_FRAME_SYNC
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 07:36:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUnpE1Wfe2dImqU0@valkosipuli.retiisi.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN_q1f_HV7Etb9i2c2_c6Trm2hAJUyd068UskJfMvT=OyiKXpA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Esker,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 01:06:20PM +0800, Esker Wong wrote:
> [send again in text mode]
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Sequence number is important to us. We need it to measure the latency
> from this event to the time we display the frame.
I think we could also add the sequence number to V4L2_EVENT_VSYNC.
Cc Hans.
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 7:06 PM Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ricardo,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:52:27AM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > Add support for the frame_sync event, so user-space can become aware
> > > earlier of new frames.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Esker Wong <esker@chromium.org>
> > > Tested-by: Esker Wong <esker@chromium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > > We have measured a latency of around 30msecs between frame sync
> > > and dqbuf.
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Suggested by Laurent. Split sequence++ and event init.
> > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020-uvc-event-v1-1-3baa0e9f6952@chromium.org
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c | 2 ++
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 7 +++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > > index f4988f03640a..9f3fb5fd2375 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > > @@ -1352,6 +1352,8 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_subscribe_event(struct v4l2_fh *fh,
> > > switch (sub->type) {
> > > case V4L2_EVENT_CTRL:
> > > return v4l2_event_subscribe(fh, sub, 0, &uvc_ctrl_sub_ev_ops);
> > > + case V4L2_EVENT_FRAME_SYNC:
> > > + return v4l2_event_subscribe(fh, sub, 0, NULL);
> > > default:
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > > index 28dde08ec6c5..4f3a510ca4fe 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > > @@ -1073,9 +1073,16 @@ static int uvc_video_decode_start(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
> > > * that discontinuous sequence numbers always indicate lost frames.
> > > */
> > > if (stream->last_fid != fid) {
> > > + struct v4l2_event event = {
> > > + .type = V4L2_EVENT_FRAME_SYNC,
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > stream->sequence++;
> > > if (stream->sequence)
> > > uvc_video_stats_update(stream);
> > > +
> > > + event.u.frame_sync.frame_sequence = stream->sequence,
> > > + v4l2_event_queue(&stream->vdev, &event);
> >
> > uvc_video_decode_start() is called when the reception of the entire frame
> > has been completed. However, the documentation for V4L2_EVENT_FRAME_SYNC
> > says that the event is "Triggered immediately when the reception of a frame
> > has begun.". The functionality here doesn't seem to fit to this patch.
> >
> > Wouldn't V4L2_EVENT_VSYNC be a better fit, even if we don't really have a
> > concept of vertical sync in the case of USB? That event doesn't have the
> > sequence though but I guess it's not an issue at least if your case.
> >
> > Another technically correct option could be to create a new event for this
> > but I'm not sure it's worth it.
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > uvc_video_clock_decode(stream, buf, data, len);
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sakari Ailus
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-07 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-06 10:52 [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Implement V4L2_EVENT_FRAME_SYNC Ricardo Ribalda
2023-11-06 11:05 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-11-06 11:58 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2023-11-07 5:06 ` Esker Wong
2023-11-07 7:36 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2023-11-07 10:58 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2023-11-07 19:27 ` nicolas
2023-11-08 6:53 ` Esker Wong
2023-11-08 7:04 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2023-11-08 20:32 ` nicolas
2023-11-08 22:10 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-11-08 22:46 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2023-11-09 0:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-11-09 0:27 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2023-11-23 18:22 ` Nicolas Dufresne
2023-11-24 9:58 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2023-11-09 0:59 ` Esker Wong
2023-11-09 11:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-11-09 11:41 ` Esker Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUnpE1Wfe2dImqU0@valkosipuli.retiisi.eu \
--to=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=esker@chromium.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox