public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com, tinghao.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/8] perf/x86: Add PERF_X86_EVENT_NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK flag
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 12:11:50 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUpTtoCzJFHhnSdh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb1ebf48-ac2f-499a-b480-ba8474b12200@linux.intel.com>

Em Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 04:19:13PM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> 
> 
> On 2023-11-06 4:12 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 01:16:20PM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
> >> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Currently, branch_sample_type !=0 is used to check whether a branch
> >> stack setup is required. But it doesn't check the sample type,
> >> unnecessary branch stack setup may be done for a counting event. E.g.,
> >> perf record -e "{branch-instructions,branch-misses}:S" -j any
> >> Also, the event only with the new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COUNTERS branch
> >> sample type may not require a branch stack setup either.
> >>
> >> Add a new flag NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK to indicate whether the event requires
> >> a branch stack setup. Replace the needs_branch_stack() by checking the
> >> new flag.
> >>
> >> The counting event check is implemented here. The later patch will take
> >> the new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COUNTERS into account.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> No changes since V4
> > 
> > So I saw this on tip/perf/urgent, I'm picking the tools bits then.
> 
> Thanks Arnaldo.
> 
> Ian has already reviewed the tool parts.
> 
> But I still owe a test case for the feature. I will post a patch later.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/acbb895a-475e-4679-98fc-6b90c05a00af@linux.intel.com/

I saw Ian's suggestion, and agree with it, we need to pair new features
with regression tests in 'perf test', thanks for working on it!

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-07 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 20:16 [PATCH V5 1/8] perf: Add branch stack counters kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 2/8] perf/x86: Add PERF_X86_EVENT_NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK flag kan.liang
2023-11-06 21:12   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-06 21:19     ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-07 15:11       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-11-08 21:31         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-09 16:14           ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-09 16:45             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-09 17:05               ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-09 18:46                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-09 19:07                   ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 3/8] perf: Add branch_sample_call_stack kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Reorganize attrs and is_visible kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Support branch counters logging kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 6/8] tools headers UAPI: Sync include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h header with the kernel kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 7/8] perf header: Support num and width of branch counters kan.liang
2023-10-26  2:10   ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 8/8] perf tools: Add branch counter knob kan.liang
2023-10-26  2:12   ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-26 18:28     ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZUpTtoCzJFHhnSdh@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tinghao.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox