From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove KVM's enumeration of Intel's architectural encodings
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:35:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUvi6P7iKMtsS8wm@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4281eee7-6423-4ec8-bb18-c6aeee1faf2c@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023, Kan Liang wrote:
> On 2023-11-07 7:31 p.m., Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > @@ -442,8 +396,29 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Map fixed counter events to architectural general purpose event encodings.
> > + * Perf doesn't provide APIs to allow KVM to directly program a fixed counter,
> > + * and so KVM instead programs the architectural event to effectively request
> > + * the fixed counter. Perf isn't guaranteed to use a fixed counter and may
> > + * instead program the encoding into a general purpose counter, e.g. if a
> > + * different perf_event is already utilizing the requested counter, but the end
> > + * result is the same (ignoring the fact that using a general purpose counter
> > + * will likely exacerbate counter contention).
> > + *
> > + * Note, reference cycles is counted using a perf-defined "psuedo-encoding",
> > + * as there is no architectural general purpose encoding for reference cycles.
>
> It's not the case for the latest Intel platforms anymore. Please see
> ffbe4ab0beda ("perf/x86/intel: Extend the ref-cycles event to GP counters").
Ugh, yeah. But that and should actually be easier to do on top.
> Maybe perf should export .event_map to KVM somehow.
Oh for ***** sake, perf already does export this for KVM. Untested, but the below
should do the trick. If I need to spin another version of this series then I'll
fold it in, otherwise I'll post it as something on top.
There's also an optimization to be had for kvm_pmu_trigger_event(), which incurs
an indirect branch not only every invocation, but on every iteration. I'll post
this one separately.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 5fc5a62af428..a02e13c2e5e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -405,25 +405,32 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
* different perf_event is already utilizing the requested counter, but the end
* result is the same (ignoring the fact that using a general purpose counter
* will likely exacerbate counter contention).
- *
- * Note, reference cycles is counted using a perf-defined "psuedo-encoding",
- * as there is no architectural general purpose encoding for reference cycles.
*/
static u64 intel_get_fixed_pmc_eventsel(int index)
{
- const struct {
- u8 eventsel;
- u8 unit_mask;
- } fixed_pmc_events[] = {
- [0] = { 0xc0, 0x00 }, /* Instruction Retired / PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS. */
- [1] = { 0x3c, 0x00 }, /* CPU Cycles/ PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES. */
- [2] = { 0x00, 0x03 }, /* Reference Cycles / PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES*/
+ enum perf_hw_id perf_id;
+ u64 eventsel;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED != 3);
+
+ switch (index) {
+ case 0:
+ perf_id = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS;
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ perf_id = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ perf_id = PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES;
+ break;
+ default:
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return 0;
};
- BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(fixed_pmc_events) != KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED);
-
- return (fixed_pmc_events[index].unit_mask << 8) |
- fixed_pmc_events[index].eventsel;
+ eventsel = perf_get_hw_event_config(perf_id);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!eventsel && index < kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed);
+ return eventsel;
}
static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-08 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-08 0:31 [PATCH v7 00/19] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 01/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 02/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that match unsupported arch events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:24 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 20:41 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 03/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove KVM's enumeration of Intel's architectural encodings Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 16:06 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-11-08 20:38 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 04/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup fixed counters' eventsel during PMU initialization Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:28 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 14:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:00 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 05/19] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:11 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 06/19] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE() Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 07/19] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 08/19] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 09/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 10/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:30 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-09 15:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 11/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 12/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:34 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-09 15:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 13/19] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:39 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 14/19] KVM: selftests: Expand PMU counters test to verify LLC events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:43 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 15/19] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to query if the PMU module param is enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:45 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 16/19] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to read integer module params Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 17/19] KVM: selftests: Query module param to detect FEP in MSR filtering test Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 18/19] KVM: selftests: Move KVM_FEP macro into common library header Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 19/19] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:51 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUvi6P7iKMtsS8wm@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox