From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6D8C61D9B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343972AbjKVShA (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:37:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33354 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231470AbjKVSg5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:36:57 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5566D62; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:36:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700678213; x=1732214213; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=c0xFg9deCV85cczPKWp2cY1uCXt2E2OindP8iQIcnNs=; b=bPmszwYKtyPKJx26DKefGFJjHK2VqowWv9nCa+Wag5wU5ildmYXUa9kT rIHY53U5bP4IRC5611Dsy5QeKa4McIZyiV6PPJVRksATNVIBRXG38VKUh BcrUE0u0VGYaI0SSDcSPwssNP8Z7WU2XYcV0RxutFE4HDr6S+X7v4e6sP gNOT9Tzvq8A2alFerazUAkNGq+Y7vpgkIowonzYGUC/XHPQ0fuv/ZWL0R D7WytgVfTshVkvf/fDVbpW/SLMowLboWatu5saJDk5CUN4QrKnb+wdINO XgelYf6pWX3tKb4RBUg8zNxjmET9GdDu5Vi1+U0Jyke9Gw2Y4mxc54e2+ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10902"; a="423227842" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,219,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="423227842" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2023 10:30:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10901"; a="716789936" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,218,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="716789936" Received: from unknown (HELO smile.fi.intel.com) ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2023 03:17:22 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1r5l1m-0000000G4Mg-2yei; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:04:18 +0200 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:04:18 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Raag Jadav Cc: mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro Message-ID: References: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 04:24:01PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using > EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro, so that the compiler can > discard it in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n. Obviously correct fix, I've pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko