public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Cc: <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	"Marcin Wojtas" <mwojtas@chromium.org>,
	Drew Davenport <ddavenport@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:13:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231105172718.18673-1-pazz@chromium.org>

On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 05:27:03PM +0000, Paz Zcharya wrote:
> Fix the value of variable `phys_base` to be the relative offset in
> stolen memory, and not the absolute offset of the GSM.

to me it looks like the other way around. phys_base is the physical
base address for the frame_buffer. Setting it to zero doesn't seem
to make that relative. And also doesn't look right.

> 
> Currently, the value of `phys_base` is set to "Surface Base Address,"
> which in the case of Meter Lake is 0xfc00_0000.

I don't believe this is a fixed value. IIRC this comes from the register
set by video bios, where the idea is to reuse the fb that was used so
far.

With this in mind I don't understand how that could overflow. Maybe
the size of the stolen is not right? maybe the size? maybe different
memory region?

> This causes the
> function `i915_gem_object_create_region_at` to fail in line 128, when
> it attempts to verify that the range does not overflow:
> 
> if (range_overflows(offset, size, resource_size(&mem->region)))
>       return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
> where:
>   offset = 0xfc000000
>   size = 0x8ca000
>   mem->region.end + 1 = 0x4400000
>   mem->region.start = 0x800000
>   resource_size(&mem->region) = 0x3c00000
> 
> call stack:
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> Looking at the flow coming next, we see that `phys_base` is only used
> once, in function `_i915_gem_object_stolen_init`, in the context of
> the offset *in* the stolen memory. Combining that with an
> examinination of the history of the file seems to indicate the
> current value set is invalid.
> 
> call stack (functions using `phys_base`)
>   _i915_gem_object_stolen_init
>   __i915_gem_object_create_region
>   i915_gem_object_create_region_at
>   initial_plane_vma
>   intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_find_initial_plane_obj
>   intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
> 
> [drm:_i915_gem_object_stolen_init] creating preallocated stolen
> object: stolen_offset=0x0000000000000000, size=0x00000000008ca000
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> index a55c09cbd0e4..e696cb13756a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  			"Using phys_base=%pa, based on initial plane programming\n",
>  			&phys_base);
>  	} else {
> -		phys_base = base;
> +		phys_base = 0;
>  		mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-15  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-05 17:27 [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute Paz Zcharya
2023-11-15  3:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-11-17 23:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paz Zcharya
2023-11-21 12:06     ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-22 13:26       ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28  1:20         ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28  3:47         ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28 11:12           ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28 11:19             ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-30 16:24             ` Paz Zcharya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ddavenport@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=pazz@chromium.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=subratabanik@google.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox