From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Cc: <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
"Marcin Wojtas" <mwojtas@chromium.org>,
Drew Davenport <ddavenport@chromium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:13:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231105172718.18673-1-pazz@chromium.org>
On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 05:27:03PM +0000, Paz Zcharya wrote:
> Fix the value of variable `phys_base` to be the relative offset in
> stolen memory, and not the absolute offset of the GSM.
to me it looks like the other way around. phys_base is the physical
base address for the frame_buffer. Setting it to zero doesn't seem
to make that relative. And also doesn't look right.
>
> Currently, the value of `phys_base` is set to "Surface Base Address,"
> which in the case of Meter Lake is 0xfc00_0000.
I don't believe this is a fixed value. IIRC this comes from the register
set by video bios, where the idea is to reuse the fb that was used so
far.
With this in mind I don't understand how that could overflow. Maybe
the size of the stolen is not right? maybe the size? maybe different
memory region?
> This causes the
> function `i915_gem_object_create_region_at` to fail in line 128, when
> it attempts to verify that the range does not overflow:
>
> if (range_overflows(offset, size, resource_size(&mem->region)))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> where:
> offset = 0xfc000000
> size = 0x8ca000
> mem->region.end + 1 = 0x4400000
> mem->region.start = 0x800000
> resource_size(&mem->region) = 0x3c00000
>
> call stack:
> i915_gem_object_create_region_at
> initial_plane_vma
> intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
> intel_find_initial_plane_obj
> intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
>
> Looking at the flow coming next, we see that `phys_base` is only used
> once, in function `_i915_gem_object_stolen_init`, in the context of
> the offset *in* the stolen memory. Combining that with an
> examinination of the history of the file seems to indicate the
> current value set is invalid.
>
> call stack (functions using `phys_base`)
> _i915_gem_object_stolen_init
> __i915_gem_object_create_region
> i915_gem_object_create_region_at
> initial_plane_vma
> intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj
> intel_find_initial_plane_obj
> intel_crtc_initial_plane_config
>
> [drm:_i915_gem_object_stolen_init] creating preallocated stolen
> object: stolen_offset=0x0000000000000000, size=0x00000000008ca000
>
> Signed-off-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> index a55c09cbd0e4..e696cb13756a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> "Using phys_base=%pa, based on initial plane programming\n",
> &phys_base);
> } else {
> - phys_base = base;
> + phys_base = 0;
> mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
> }
>
> --
> 2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-15 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-05 17:27 [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix phys_base to be relative not absolute Paz Zcharya
2023-11-15 3:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-11-17 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paz Zcharya
2023-11-21 12:06 ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-22 13:26 ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28 1:20 ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28 3:47 ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-28 11:12 ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-11-28 11:19 ` Paz Zcharya
2023-11-30 16:24 ` Paz Zcharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZVQ3d8FFqxsy0OX7@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ddavenport@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=pazz@chromium.org \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=subratabanik@google.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox